The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An empirical analysis of strategy types
Abstract
Using the PIMS SPIYR data base, which pools cross‐section and timeseries data, an empirical study to identify business strategy types was undertaken. Using a two‐stage methodological approach combining principal component and cluster analysis on both a consumer products and an industrial products data base, two sets of strategy typologies were identified. Six strategy types were identified for consumer products: (1) harvest, (2) builder, (3) cashout, (4) niche or specialization, (5) climber, and (6) continuity. For industrial products, four strategy types were identified: (1) low commitment, (2) growth, (3) maintenance, and (4) niche or specialization. A discussion of the characteristics of each strategy type is offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Cited by
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
THE APPLICATION OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE
KETCHEN Jr., D. J., & SHOOK, C. L. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::aid-smj819>3.0.co;2-g · Cited by 2,375
The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives
Simons, R. (1990) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(90)90018-p · Cited by 1,014
Justin Tan, J., & Litsschert, R. J. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150102 · Cited by 641
How strategy‐making processes can make a difference
Hart, S., & Banbury, C. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150402 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- Galbraith, C., & Schendel, D.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-173
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2084102362
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical analysis of strategy types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.4250040206
- The paper
- Galbraith, C., & Schendel, D. (1983). An empirical analysis of strategy types. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250040206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
