The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Country capabilities and the permeability of borders
Abstract
The history of international competition shows long cycles in country leadership. This paper argues that these cycles can be explained by differences in country capabilities, in terms of both technologies and organizing principles, which diffuse more slowly across than within national and regional borders. The country that innovates in best practices eventually loses leadership, but not before increasing its wealth and claims on foreign assets and investments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Cited by
Abrahamson, E. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258636 · Cited by 1,828
Organizational Capabilities in Complex Worlds
Levinthal, D. A. (2001) · The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities · doi:10.1093/0199248540.003.0014 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Kogut, B.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 33-47
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2067112134
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
