The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research notes and communications factors in the instability of international joint ventures: An event history analysis
Abstract
This study uses Event History methodology to examine factors that may contribute to the instability of joint ventures between U.S. multinationals and foreign companies. Using joint venture contract renegotiation as a proxy for instability, it finds statistically significant support for hypotheses that joint ventures are more unstable when partners start out with uneven shares of equity and when the contracts have been renegotiated before. Contract renegotiation is also more likely in relatively open economies than in countries that impose restrictions on direct investment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500307 · Cited by 1,364
Analyzing Foreign Market Entry Strategies: Extending the Internalization Approach
Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (1998) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490006 · Cited by 875
Identifying cross‐selling opportunities, using lifestyle segmentation and survival analysis
Ansell, J., Harrison, T., & Archibald, T. (2007) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/02634500710754619 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Blodgett, L. L.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 475-481
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2136054641
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
