The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type: A research note
Abstract
This paper reports the results of a study that investigated the strategic involvement of 259 middle managers in 25 organizations. Drawing from previous clinical research, a theoretical typology of middle management roles in strategy is developed. Measures for each role are derived, and the relationship between middle management strategic involvement and Miles and Snow's (1978) strategic type is examined. Results suggest the usefulness of these measures in assessing both the level and type of middle management strategic activity. In addition, the findings show that middle managers in Prospectors report significantly higher levels of upward and divergent forms of strategic involvement than those in Analyzers and Defenders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Cited by
Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact
DeChurch, L. A., Hiller, N. J., Murase, T., Doty, D., & Salas, E. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009 · Cited by 211
Developing capacity for change
Meyer, C. B., & Stensaker, I. G. (2006) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/14697010600693731 · Cited by 202
Ashmos, D. P., Duchon, D., & McDaniel, R. R. (1998) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01343.x · Cited by 112
Al‐Hashimi, K., Weerakkody, V., Elbanna, S., & Schwarz, G. (2022) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13447 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 153-167
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2150808789
- Cited by
- 747
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
