Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 924

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance

Hagedoorn, John, Schakenraad, Jos·1994·Strategic Management Journal
DOI 10.1002/smj.4250150404
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Strategic technology partnering between firms has become a growing subject of interest to both companies experimenting with this mode of economic organization and researchers from a wide variety of academic disciplines. In this study an effort is made to measure the effect of strategic technology partnering on companies engaged in such joint efforts. A study of the relevant literature on interfirm cooperation generates some basic understanding of this phenomenon, after which the empirical analysis is expanded with linear structural modeling of a number of relevant explanatory variables setting strategic partnering in a more complex environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.4250150404

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Ansoff I., 1990, Implanting Strategic Management
  2. 10.4159/harvard.9780674188037 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Berg S. V., 1982, Joint Venture Strategies and Corporate Innovation
  4. 10.1016/0167-7187(89)90051-9 · DOI
  5. Chesnais F., 1988, Technical co‐operation agreements between firms, STI Review, 4, 51
  6. 10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02006-6 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Contractor F. J., 1988, Cooperative Strategies in International Business, 3
  8. 10.1016/0167-7187(89)90047-7 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1467-8616.1990.tb00007.x · DOI
  10. Devine P. J., 1986, An Introduction to Industrial Economics
  11. 10.1007/978-1-349-17521-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 1980, Fortune
  13. Freeman C., 1982, The Economics of Industrial Innovation
  14. Gujarati D. N., 1988, Basic Econometrics
  15. Hagedoorn J., 1989, The Dynamic Analysis of Innovation and Diffusion
  16. 10.1016/0166-4972(90)90039-M · DOI
  17. 10.1002/smj.4250140505 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/978-94-009-2073-6_10 · DOI
  19. Hagedoorn J., 1990, New Explorations in the Economics of Technical Change, 3
  20. Hagedoorn J.andJ.Schakenraad(1990c). ‘Technology cooperation strategic alliances and their motives: Brother can you spare a dime or do you have a light?’ Paper for SMS conference Stockholm September 24–27 1990.
  21. Hay D. A., 1979, Industrial Economics: Theory and Evidence
  22. Hayduk L. A., 1987, Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, Essentials and Advances
  23. Hergert M., 1988, Cooperative Strategies in International Business, 99
  24. Hladik K. J., 1985, International Joint Ventures
  25. Hladik K. J., 1988, Cooperative Strategies in International Business, 187
  26. International Business Week, 1980, R & D Scoreboard
  27. Jöreskog K. G., 1977, Latent Variables in Socio‐Economic Models
  28. Joreskog K. G., 1977, Latent Variables in Socio‐Economic Models, 285
  29. Kamien M. I., 1982, Market Structure and Innovation
  30. Link A. N., 1989, Cooperative Research in U.S. Manufacturing: Assessing Policy Initiatives and Corporate Strategies
  31. Mansfield E., 1984, R & D, Patents and Productivity, 127
  32. Meeks G., 1977, Disappointing Marriage: A Study of the Gains from Merger
  33. Mueller D. C., 1986, The Modern Corporation–Profits, Power, Growth and Performance
  34. 10.1017/CBO9780511664731 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/0167-7187(89)90043-X · DOI
  36. Mytelka L. K., 1991, Strategic Partnerships and the World Economy
  37. 10.1016/0167-7187(89)90046-5 · DOI
  38. Ohmae K., 1985, Triad Power
  39. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490289 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.2307/2098636 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Philips A., 1971, Technology and Marketstructure
  42. Porter M. E.(May‐June1987). ‘From competitive advantage to corporate strategy’ Harvard Business Review pp.43–59.
  43. 10.2307/2098409 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0167-7187(89)90048-9 · DOI
  45. Saris W., 1984, Causal Modelling in Nonexperimental Research, an Introduction to the LISREL Approach
  46. Scherer F. M., 1965, Firm size, marketstructure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions, American Economic Review, 15, 1097
  47. Scherer F. M., 1984, Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives
  48. 10.1257/jep.2.1.69 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02004-2 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.4159/harvard.9780674432833 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/0014-2921(79)90024-2 · DOI

Cited by

See all 924

Metadata

Authors
Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J.
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-05
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
291-309
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
DOI
10.1002/smj.4250150404
OpenAlex
W2090086742
Cited by
924
References
0
FWCI
43.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 4574 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.4250150404
The paper
Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J. (1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150404

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.