The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage
Abstract
Strategy implementation scholars have traditionally focused their attention on behavioral and social phenomenc in a firm that enable it to both choose and implement its strategies. Unfortunately, some of this work has assumed that it is possible to study strategy implementation independent of the content of a firm's strategies, and independent of the particular competitive context within which a firm operates. Recent developments in the resource-based view of the firm reaffirm the importance of studying the strategic consequences of behavioral and social phenomena within a firm, but suggest that separating this work from the content of strategy, or from the competitive context of a firm, is inappropriate. The papers in this special issue focus on important behavioral and social phenomena in a firm (e.g., organizational behavior), but do so in an explicit competitive context (e.g., competitive organizational behavior).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Self-citationStrategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
Self-citation
Cited by
Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views
Oliver, C. (1997) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::aid-smj909>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 2,852
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225
Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069408 · Cited by 1,312
Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.174 · Cited by 1,113
Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing
Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0298 · Cited by 861
Metadata
- Authors
- Barney, J. B., & Zajac, E. J.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 5-9
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2097402444
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.4250150902
- The paper
- Barney, J. B., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
