The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
She'‐e‐os: gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments
Abstract
This study uses Kanter's token status theory to link announcements of top executives to shareholder reactions, highlighting possible gender effects. Using a sample of top executive announcements from 1990 to 2000, our results show that investor reactions to the announcements of female CEOs are significantly more negative than those of their male counterparts. Furthermore, women who have been promoted from within a firm are viewed more positively than women who come from outside. To supplement our analysis of investor reactions, we also analyze the text of popular press articles surrounding the announcements of male and female CEOs. These results show that articles about the appointment of a female CEO tend to emphasize gender, gender‐related and other job or organizational considerations. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory
Pelled, L. H. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.6.615 · Cited by 1,489
To your heart's content: a model of affective diversity in top management teams
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667020 · Cited by 599
Cited by
Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation
Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1955 · Cited by 1,424
Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence
Brahma, S., Nwafor, C., & Boateng, A. (2021) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.2089 · Cited by 473
Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., & Peters, K. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008 · Cited by 439
Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption?
Atif, M., Hossain, M., Alam, M. S., & Goergen, M. (2021) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101665 · Cited by 434
Jeong, S.-H., & Harrison, D. A. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0716 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, P. M., & James, E. H.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-30
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-241
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2798008933
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: She'‐e‐os: gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.575
- The paper
- Lee, P. M., & James, E. H. (2007). She'‐e‐os: gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
