Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toxicological Aspects of Long‐Term Treatment of Keratinocytes with ZnO and TiO2 Nanoparticles

Kocbek, Petra, Teskač, Karmen, Kreft, Mateja E., Kristl, Julijana·2010·Small

Abstract

Sunscreens containing ZnO and TiO 2 nanoparticles (NPs) are increasingly applied to skin over long time periods to reduce the risk of skin cancer. However, long‐term toxicological studies of NPs are very sparse. The in vitro toxicity of ZnO and TiO 2 NPs on keratinocytes over short‐ and long‐term applications is reported. The effects studied are intracellular formation of radicals, alterations in cell morphology, mitochondrial activity, and cell‐cycle distribution. Cellular response depends on the type of NP, concentration, and exposure time. ZnO NPs have more pronounced adverse effects on keratinocytes than TiO 2. TiO 2 has no effect on cell viability up to 100 μg mL−1, whereas ZnO reduces viability above 15 μg mL−1 after short‐term exposure. Prolonged exposure to ZnO NPs at 10 μg mL−1 results in decreased mitochondrial activity, loss of normal cell morphology, and disturbances in cell‐cycle distribution. From this point of view TiO 2 has no harmful effect. More nanotubular intercellular structures are observed in keratinocytes exposed to either type of NP than in untreated cells. This observation may indicate cellular transformation from normal to tumor cells due to NP treatment. Transmission electron microscopy images show NPs in vesicles within the cell cytoplasm, particularly in early and late endosomes and amphisomes. Contrary to insoluble TiO 2, partially soluble ZnO stimulates generation of reactive oxygen species to swamp the cell redox defense system thus initiating the death processes, seen also in cell‐cycle distribution and fluorescence imaging. Long‐term exposure to NPs has adverse effects on human keratinocytes in vitro, which indicates a potential health risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.201000032

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Kocbek, P., Teskač, K., Kreft, M. E., & Kristl, J.
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-30
Volume
6
Issue
17
Pages
1908-1917
ISSN
  • 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-6829
OpenAlex
W1964864756
Cited by
208
References
6
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicological Aspects of Long‐Term Treatment of Keratinocytes with ZnO and TiO2 Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201000032
The paper
Kocbek, P., Teskač, K., Kreft, M. E., & Kristl, J. (2010). Toxicological Aspects of Long‐Term Treatment of Keratinocytes with ZnO and TiO2 Nanoparticles. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201000032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.