The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Metal‐Free, Free‐Standing, Macroporous Graphene@g‐C3N4 Composite Air Electrode for High‐Energy Lithium Oxygen Batteries
Abstract
The nonaqueous lithium oxygen battery is a promising candidate as a next‐generation energy storage system because of its potentially high energy density (up to 2–3 kW kg−1), exceeding that of any other existing energy storage system for storing sustainable and clean energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the consumption of nonrenewable fossil fuels. To achieve high energy density, long cycling stability, and low cost, the air electrode structure and the electrocatalysts play important roles. Here, a metal‐free, free‐standing macroporous graphene@graphitic carbon nitride (g‐C 3 N 4) composite air cathode is first reported, in which the g‐C 3 N 4 nanosheets can act as efficient electrocatalysts, and the macroporous graphene nanosheets can provide space for Li 2 O 2 to deposit and also promote the electron transfer. The electrochemical results on the graphene@g‐C 3 N 4 composite air electrode show a 0.48 V lower charging plateau and a 0.13 V higher discharging plateau than those of pure graphene air electrode, with a discharge capacity of nearly 17300 mA h g−1 (composite). Excellent cycling performance, with terminal voltage higher than 2.4 V after 105 cycles at 1000 mA h g−1 (composite) capacity, can also be achieved. Therefore, this hybrid material is a promising candidate for use as a high energy, long‐cycle‐life, and low‐cost cathode material for lithium oxygen batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ong, W.-J., Tan, L.-L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S.-T., & Chai, S.-P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 · Cited by 7,147
2D Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Energy Conversion and Storage
Wang, Y., Liu, L., Ma, T., Zhang, Y., & Huang, H. (2021) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202102540 · Cited by 448
Tong, Z., Yang, D., Shi, J., Nan, Y., Sun, Y., & Jiang, Z. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b09503 · Cited by 431
Nanostructured positive electrode materials for post-lithium ion batteries
Wang, F., Wu, X., Li, C., Zhu, Y., Fu, L., Wu, Y., & Liu, X. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee02070d · Cited by 293
Advances and challenges in lithium-air batteries
Tan, P., Jiang, H. R., Zhu, X. B., An, L., Jung, C. Y., Wu, M. C., Shi, L., Shyy, W., & Zhao, T. S. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.054 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, W., Chou, S., Wang, J., Zhai, Y., & Liu, H.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-16
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2817-2824
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2147230795
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Metal‐Free, Free‐Standing, Macroporous Graphene@g‐C3N4 Composite Air Electrode for High‐Energy Lithium Oxygen Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201403535
- The paper
- Luo, W., Chou, S., Wang, J., Zhai, Y., & Liu, H. (2015). A Metal‐Free, Free‐Standing, Macroporous Graphene@g‐C3N4 Composite Air Electrode for High‐Energy Lithium Oxygen Batteries. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201403535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.