Cited by 148Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Nickel@Nitrogen‐Doped Carbon@MoS2 Nanosheets: An Efficient Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Shah, Sayyar Ali, Shen, Xiaoping, Xie, Minghua, Zhu, Guoxing, Ji, Zhenyuan, Zhou, Hongbo, Xu, Keqiang, Yue, Xiaoyang +3 more·2019·Small

Abstract

Developing cheap, abundant, and easily available electrocatalysts to drive the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) at small overpotentials is an urgent demand of hydrogen production from water splitting. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) based composites have emerged as competitive electrocatalysts for HER in recent years. Herein, nickel@nitrogen-doped carbon@MoS 2 nanosheets (Ni@NC@MoS 2 ) hybrid sub-microspheres are presented as HER catalyst. MoS 2 nanosheets with expanded interlayer spacings are vertically grown on nickel@nitrogen-doped carbon (Ni@NC) substrate to form Ni@NC@MoS 2 hierarchical sub-microspheres by a simple hydrothermal process. The formed Ni@NC@MoS 2 composites display excellent electrocatalytic activity for HER with an onset overpotential of 18 mV, a low overpotential of 82 mV at 10 mA cm -2 , a small Tafel slope of 47.5 mV dec -1 , and high durability in 0.5 H 2 SO 4 solution. The outstanding HER performance of the Ni@NC@MoS 2 catalyst can be ascribed to the synergistic effect of dense catalytic sites on MoS 2 nanosheets with exposed edges and expanded interlayer spacings, and the rapid electron transfer from Ni@NC substrate to MoS 2 nanosheets. The excellent Ni@NC@MoS 2 electrocatalyst promises potential application in practical hydrogen production, and the strategy reported here can also be extended to grow MoS 2 on other nitrogen-doped carbon encapsulated metal species for various applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.201804545

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, S. A., Shen, X., Xie, M., Zhu, G., Ji, Z., Zhou, H., Xu, K., Yue, X., Yuan, A., Zhu, J., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Jiangsu University (CN)
  • Key Laboratory for Advanced Technology in Environmental Protection of Jiangsu Province Yancheng Institute of Technology Yancheng 224051 P. R. China
  • Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Shen, Xiaoping
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-25
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
e1804545-e1804545
ISSN
  • 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-6829
OpenAlex
W2915024983
Cited by
148
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 18
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Small (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21875091, 21776115, 51602129)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20171295, BK20161343)
  • Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of New Environmental Protection (JH201804)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, MoS2 nanosheets, electrocatalysts, water splitting, expanded interlayer spacing, edge sites, electron transfer, hydrogen production, Tafel slope, catalyst stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review