Cited by 42Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Nanoscaled and Atomic Ruthenium Electrocatalysts Confined Inside Super‐Hydrophilic Carbon Nanofibers for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Xie, Qianjie, Wang, Zheng, Lin, Like, Shu, Yu, Zhang, Jingjing, Li, Cong, Shen, Yehua, Uyama, Hiroshi·2021·Small

Abstract

A series of Ru‐based catalysts have been developed for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) by the facile impregnation of copious and eco‐friendly bacterial cellulose (BC) with Ru(bpy)3 Cl 2 (bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine) followed by pyrolysis. After the oxidation and molecular recomposition processes that occur within the BC precursors during pyrolysis, sub‐2 nm Ru nanoparticles (NPs) and atomic Ru species confined within surface‐oxidized N‐doped carbon nanofibers (CNFs) can be observed in the derived catalysts. The surface oxidation of CNFs leads the derived catalysts with super hydrophilicity and water‐absorbing capacity, and also provides dimensional confinement for the nanoscaled and atomic Ru species. With these added structural advantages and the component synergy, the derived catalysts show superior HER activities, for which the overpotentials are as low as 19.6 mV (1 m KOH) and 55.0 mV (0.5 m H 2 SO 4) for the most active case at the current density of 10 mA cm−2. Moreover, superior HER activity can be also achieved for the catalysts derived with a wide range of Ru loadings. Finally, the influence of Ru NP size on HER activity is investigated by density functional theory simulations. This method provides a reliable protocol for preparing highly active HER catalysts for scale‐up applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.202102160

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 42

Authors
Xie, Q., Wang, Z., Lin, L., Shu, Y., Zhang, J., Li, C., Shen, Y., & Uyama, H.
Affiliations
Northwest University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Zheng
  • Shen, Yehua
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-06
Volume
17
Issue
38
Pages
e2102160-e2102160
ISSN
  • 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-6829
OpenAlex
W3187369855
Cited by
42
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Small (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21975203)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, ruthenium electrocatalysts, ruthenium nanoparticles, carbon nanofibers, bacterial cellulose, superhydrophilicity, nitrogen-doped carbon, pyrolysis, surface oxidation, dimensional confinement, nanoparticle size effects, density functional theory
MeSH terms
Carbon, Hydrogen, Ruthenium, Nanofibers, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review