Cited by 45Software Engineering ResearchAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniques

Understanding software architecture erosion: A systematic mapping study

Open access
Li, Ruiyin, Liang, Peng, Soliman, Mohamed, Avgeriou, Paris·2022·Journal of Software: Evolution and Process

Abstract

Architecture erosion (AEr) can adversely affect software development and has received significant attention in the last decade. However, there is an absence of a comprehensive understanding of the state of research about the reasons and consequences of AEr, and the countermeasures to address AEr. This work aims at systematically investigating, identifying, and analyzing the reasons, consequences, and ways of detecting and handling AEr. With 73 studies included, the main results are as follows: (1) AEr manifests not only through architectural violations and structural issues but also causing problems in software quality and during software evolution; (2) non‐technical reasons that cause AEr should receive the same attention as technical reasons, and practitioners should raise awareness of the grave consequences of AEr, thereby taking actions to tackle AEr‐related issues; (3) a spectrum of approaches, tools, and measures has been proposed and employed to detect and tackle AEr; and (4) three categories of difficulties and five categories of lessons learned on tackling AEr were identified. The results can provide researchers a comprehensive understanding of AEr and help practitioners handle AEr and improve the sustainability of their architecture. More empirical studies are required to investigate the practices of detecting and addressing AEr in industrial settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smr.2423

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Architecture erosion tends to affect quality and evolution of software systems, manifesting various symptoms.

    “Architecture erosion tends to affect the quality and evolution of software systems, manifesting various symptoms as mentioned in our interviews and the literature [49].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, R., Liang, P., Soliman, M., & Avgeriou, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liang, Peng
Venue
Journal of Software: Evolution and Process
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02-09
Volume
34
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 2047-7473 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-7481
OpenAlex
W4211100048
Cited by
45
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Software Evolution and Process (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62172311)
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Keywords
software quality, software evolution, lessons learned, software sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review