Cited by 3Supramolecular Self-Assembly in MaterialsNerve injury and regenerationChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Design of the Hydrophobic Core of Self‐Assembling Peptide Fibrils for Enhanced Neural Regeneration

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Neurons have limited self‐repair ability, and typical treatment approaches for damaged tissue rely on surgery. Hindered by the lack of donor tissues and the complex neural environment, there is great interest in developing biomaterials to support neural regeneration. Self‐assembling peptides with fibrous structures mimicking the extracellular matrix have shown great potential as neurosupportive biomaterials. Previously, we identified peptide sequences derived from enhancing factor‐C (EF‐C) that are neurotrophic without additional supplements. Here, a library of nine EF‐C variants is designed by varying the hydrophobic core of the peptide backbone to elucidate its influence on self‐assembly and bioactivity. The physicochemical properties of these variants, including secondary structure and morphology, are thoroughly analyzed. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations based on AlphaFold 3 models are conducted, providing theoretical insights that explain the differential assembly and stability of EF‐C variants. Subsequently, the peptides are tested for bioactivity in a neuroblastoma cell line (SH‐SY5Y) to establish structure–property relationships. The structure‐forming EF‐C variants, particularly those featuring phenylalanine and isoleucine, are neurotrophic toward SH‐SY5Y cells, shown by enhanced ATP levels. The combination of experimental and computational methods provides a strategy for the accelerated design of neuro‐regenerative peptides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smsc.202500224

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. 10.1002/adhm.202402939 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01074 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00524 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/adfm.202110628 · DOI
  5. 10.3389/fncel.2019.00528 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.01.008 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.abh3602 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.stem.2022.12.010 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00297 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/acsnano.3c04572 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/term.2644 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.005 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120401 · DOI
  14. 10.1039/C7NR06528K · DOI
  15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00690 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nnano.2012.248 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/adfm.201809112 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/mabi.202100347 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/bm200510k · DOI
  20. 10.1021/bm400876s · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acsami.7b11681 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/jacs.2c05759 · DOI
  23. 10.1042/BSR20181415 · DOI
  24. Klunk W. E., 1999, Methods in Enzymology, 285
  25. 10.1002/bip.360250307 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/nprot.2015.024 · DOI
  27. 10.3109/10409239509085140 · DOI
  28. Serpell L. C., 1999, Methods in Enzymology, 526
  29. 10.1007/978-1-61779-551-0_9 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41467-023-40663-6 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.nantod.2024.102160 · DOI
  32. 10.1063/5.0142302 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01466 · DOI
  34. 10.1039/D0QM00369G · DOI
  35. 10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00754 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/psc.310010507 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/ja908560n · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.06.006 · DOI
  39. 10.1039/C5CS00941C · DOI
  40. 10.1039/D3SC00159H · DOI
  41. 10.1002/adfm.202316260 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s12551-016-0218-6 · DOI
  43. 10.1126/sciadv.abj0305 · DOI
  44. 10.1039/C9CP00482C · DOI
  45. 10.1126/science.178.4063.871 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.04.021 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100772 · DOI
  48. Seshadri S., 1999, Methods in Enzymology, 559
  49. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05025.x · DOI
  50. 10.1021/acspolymersau.1c00052 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00151 · DOI
  52. 10.1007/978-1-62703-640-5_2 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.3233/JAD-2010-091363 · DOI
  54. 10.1021/acsomega.3c08962 · DOI
  55. Gordon J., 2013, Neuronal Cell Culture: Methods and Protocols
  56. 10.1116/1.4931636 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.aanat.2022.151955 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/s41570-020-0215-y · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.117 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/rb/rbz007 · DOI
  61. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01769 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.013 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1038/aps.2017.28 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.020 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.017 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.01.005 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.07.020 · DOI
  68. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Nečas D., 2012, Analysis, 10, 181
  70. 10.1002/pro.4792 · DOI
  71. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  72. 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E · DOI
  74. 10.1007/s008940100045 · DOI
  75. S.Páll M. J.Abraham C.Kutzner B.Hess E.Lindahl.inInt. Conf. on Exascale Applications and Software(Eds:S.MarkidisE.Laure) Vol.8759 Springer Cham2015 pp.3–27. · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1021/ct700301q · DOI
  78. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055 · DOI
  79. 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
  80. 10.1002/jcc.23354 · DOI
  81. 10.1063/1.470117 · DOI
  82. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  83. 10.1002/jcc.540130805 · DOI
  84. 10.1063/1.2408420 · DOI
  85. 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
  86. 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
  87. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990115)38:1/2<236::AID-ANIE236>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  88. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1021/j100785a001 · DOI
  90. 10.1002/jcc.540160303 · DOI
  91. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01344 · DOI
  93. 10.1002/cyto.a.20895 · DOI
  94. 10.1002/cyto.a.20022 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tsai, Y., Cavallo, P., Lu, Q., Yu, J., Ender, C. P., Link, J., Amann‐Winkel, K., Endres, K., Synatschke, C. V., & John, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Constructor University (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Synatschke, Christopher V.
  • John, Torsten
Venue
Small Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-09-04
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
2500224-2500224
ISSN
2688-4046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413994699
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Small Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (441734479)
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
self-assembling peptides, hydrophobic core, nerve regeneration, peptide fibrils, extracellular matrix mimics, neurotrophic activity, SH-SY5Y cells, structure-property relationships, peptide variants, ATP levels, biomaterials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review