The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design of the Hydrophobic Core of Self‐Assembling Peptide Fibrils for Enhanced Neural Regeneration
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Neurons have limited self‐repair ability, and typical treatment approaches for damaged tissue rely on surgery. Hindered by the lack of donor tissues and the complex neural environment, there is great interest in developing biomaterials to support neural regeneration. Self‐assembling peptides with fibrous structures mimicking the extracellular matrix have shown great potential as neurosupportive biomaterials. Previously, we identified peptide sequences derived from enhancing factor‐C (EF‐C) that are neurotrophic without additional supplements. Here, a library of nine EF‐C variants is designed by varying the hydrophobic core of the peptide backbone to elucidate its influence on self‐assembly and bioactivity. The physicochemical properties of these variants, including secondary structure and morphology, are thoroughly analyzed. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations based on AlphaFold 3 models are conducted, providing theoretical insights that explain the differential assembly and stability of EF‐C variants. Subsequently, the peptides are tested for bioactivity in a neuroblastoma cell line (SH‐SY5Y) to establish structure–property relationships. The structure‐forming EF‐C variants, particularly those featuring phenylalanine and isoleucine, are neurotrophic toward SH‐SY5Y cells, shown by enhanced ATP levels. The combination of experimental and computational methods provides a strategy for the accelerated design of neuro‐regenerative peptides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 94
- 10.1002/adhm.202402939 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01074 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00524 · DOI
- 10.1002/adfm.202110628 · DOI
- 10.3389/fncel.2019.00528 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.01.008 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abh3602 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.stem.2022.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00297 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.3c04572 · DOI
- 10.1002/term.2644 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120401 · DOI
- 10.1039/C7NR06528K · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00690 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2012.248 · DOI
- 10.1002/adfm.201809112 · DOI
- 10.1002/mabi.202100347 · DOI
- 10.1021/bm200510k · DOI
- 10.1021/bm400876s · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.7b11681 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.2c05759 · DOI
- 10.1042/BSR20181415 · DOI
- Klunk W. E., 1999, Methods in Enzymology, 285
- 10.1002/bip.360250307 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nprot.2015.024 · DOI
- 10.3109/10409239509085140 · DOI
- Serpell L. C., 1999, Methods in Enzymology, 526
- 10.1007/978-1-61779-551-0_9 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-40663-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nantod.2024.102160 · DOI
- 10.1063/5.0142302 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01466 · DOI
- 10.1039/D0QM00369G · DOI
- 10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00754 · DOI
- 10.1002/psc.310010507 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja908560n · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1039/C5CS00941C · DOI
- 10.1039/D3SC00159H · DOI
- 10.1002/adfm.202316260 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12551-016-0218-6 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.abj0305 · DOI
- 10.1039/C9CP00482C · DOI
- 10.1126/science.178.4063.871 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.04.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100772 · DOI
- Seshadri S., 1999, Methods in Enzymology, 559
- 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05025.x · DOI
- 10.1021/acspolymersau.1c00052 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00151 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-62703-640-5_2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3233/JAD-2010-091363 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsomega.3c08962 · DOI
- Gordon J., 2013, Neuronal Cell Culture: Methods and Protocols
- 10.1116/1.4931636 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aanat.2022.151955 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41570-020-0215-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.117 · DOI
- 10.1093/rb/rbz007 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01769 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/aps.2017.28 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.07.020 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2089 · DOI · Paper page
- Nečas D., 2012, Analysis, 10, 181
- 10.1002/pro.4792 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E · DOI
- 10.1007/s008940100045 · DOI
- S.Páll M. J.Abraham C.Kutzner B.Hess E.Lindahl.inInt. Conf. on Exascale Applications and Software(Eds:S.MarkidisE.Laure) Vol.8759 Springer Cham2015 pp.3–27. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ct700301q · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.23354 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.470117 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540130805 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2408420 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990115)38:1/2<236::AID-ANIE236>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/j100785a001 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540160303 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01344 · DOI
- 10.1002/cyto.a.20895 · DOI
- 10.1002/cyto.a.20022 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, Y., Cavallo, P., Lu, Q., Yu, J., Ender, C. P., Link, J., Amann‐Winkel, K., Endres, K., Synatschke, C. V., & John, T.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (DE)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Constructor University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Synatschke, Christopher V.
- John, Torsten
- ORCID
- Venue
- Small Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-09-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2500224-2500224
- ISSN
- 2688-4046 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12499481
- OpenAlex
- W4413994699
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Small Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (441734479)
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- China Scholarship Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- self-assembling peptides, hydrophobic core, nerve regeneration, peptide fibrils, extracellular matrix mimics, neurotrophic activity, SH-SY5Y cells, structure-property relationships, peptide variants, ATP levels, biomaterials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review