The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inter‐Cloud architectures and application brokering: taxonomy and survey
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Although Cloud computing itself has many open problems, researchers in the field have already made the leap to envision Inter‐Cloud computing. Their goal is to achieve better overall Quality of Service (QoS), reliability and cost efficiency by utilizing multiple clouds. Inter‐Cloud research is still in its infancy, and the body of knowledge in the area has not been well defined yet. In this work, we propose and motivate taxonomies for Inter‐Cloud architectures and application brokering mechanisms. We present a detailed survey of the state of the art in terms of both academic and industry developments (20 projects), and we fit each project onto the discussed taxonomies. We discuss how the current Inter‐Cloud environments facilitate brokering of distributed applications across clouds considering their nonfunctional requirements. Finally, we analyse the existing works and identify open challenges and trends in the area of Inter‐Cloud application brokering. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Taxonomy and Survey of Energy-Efficient Data Centers and Cloud Computing Systems
Beloglazov, A., Buyya, R., Lee, Y. C., & Zomaya, A. (2011) · Advances in Computers · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385512-1.00003-7 · Cited by 777
Self-citation
Cited by
Integration of Cloud computing and Internet of Things: A survey
Botta, A., de Donato, W., Persico, V., & Pescapé, A. (2016) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.09.021 · Cited by 2,388
MeDShare: Trust-Less Medical Data Sharing Among Cloud Service Providers via Blockchain
Xia, Q., Sifah, E. B., Asamoah, K. O., Gao, J., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2730843 · Cited by 1,148
Challenges and opportunities in edge computing
Varghese, B., Wang, N., Barbhuiya, S., Kilpatrick, P., & Nikolopoulos, D. S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud (SmartCloud) · doi:10.1109/smartcloud.2016.18 · Cited by 565
EdgeMediChain: A Hybrid Edge Blockchain-Based Framework for Health Data Exchange
Akkaoui, R., Hei, X., & Cheng, W. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3003575 · Cited by 175
Lins, S., Schneider, S., Szefer, J., Ibraheem, S., & Ali, A. (2019) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.04425 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Grozev, N., & Buyya, R.
- Venue
- Software: Practice and Experience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-12
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 369-390
- ISSN
- 0038-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-024X
- OpenAlex
- W1587464373
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 117.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
