The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A fortran language system for mutation‐based software testing
Abstract
Mutation analysis is a powerful technique for testing software systems. The Mothra software testing project uses mutation analysis as the basis for an integrated software testing environment. Mutation analysis requires executing many slightly differing versions of the same program to evaluate the quality of the data used to test the program. The current version of Mothra includes a complete language system that translates a program to be tested into intermediate code so that it and its mutated versions can be executed by an interpreter. In this paper, we discuss some of the unique requirements of a language system used in a mutation‐based testing environment. We then describe how these requirements affected the design and implementation of the Fortran 77 version of the Mothra system. We also describe the intermediate language used by Mothra and the features of the language system that are needed for software testing. The appendices contain a full description of the intermediate language and the mutation operators used by Mothra. The design and implementation techniques that were developed for Mothra are applicable for constructing not just software testing systems, but any type of program analysis system or language system for a special‐purpose application. In particular, we discuss decisions made and techniques developed by the Mothra team that can be useful in such applications as debuggers, program measurement tools, software development environments and other types of program analysis systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools
Aho, A. V., Sethi, R., & Ullman, J. D. (1986) · Cited by 8,082
Symbolic execution and program testing
King, J. C. (1976) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/360248.360252 · Cited by 3,031
Hints on Test Data Selection: Help for the Practicing Programmer
DeMillo, R. A., Lipton, R. J., & Sayward, F. G. (1978) · Computer · doi:10.1109/c-m.1978.218136 · Cited by 2,081
Object oriented design with applications
Booch, G. (1990) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,925
Weak Mutation Testing and Completeness of Test Sets
Howden, W. E. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1982.235571 · Cited by 477
Reliability of the Path Analysis Testing Strategy
Howden, W. E. (1976) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1976.233816 · Cited by 400
An extended overview of the Mothra software testing environment
DeMillo, R. A., Guindi, D. S., McCracken, W. M., Offutt, A. J., & King, K. N. (2003) · [1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis · doi:10.1109/wst.1988.5369 · Cited by 257
Self-citationFunctional program testing and analysis
Howden, W. E. (1986) · McGraw-Hill, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 208
The design of a prototype mutation system for program testing
Budd, T. A., Lipton, R. J., DeMillo, R. A., & Sayward, F. G. (1899) · AFIPS conference proceedings · doi:10.1109/afips.1978.195 · Cited by 92
Automatic test data generation
Offutt, V. A. J., & DeMillo, R. A. (1988) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · Cited by 76
Cited by
An Analysis and Survey of the Development of Mutation Testing
Jia, Y., & Harman, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2010.62 · Cited by 1,745
Software unit test coverage and adequacy
Zhu, H., Hall, P. A. V., & May, J. H. R. (1997) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/267580.267590 · Cited by 1,247
Constraint-based automatic test data generation
DeMilli, R. A., & Offutt, A. J. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.92910 · Cited by 804
Self-citationA mutation carol: Past, present and future
Offutt, J. (2011) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.03.007 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- King, K. N., & Offutt, A. J.
- Venue
- Software: Practice and Experience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 685-718
- ISSN
- 0038-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-024X
- OpenAlex
- W1974858479
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 28.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A fortran language system for mutation‐based software testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/spe.4380210704
- The paper
- King, K. N., & Offutt, A. J. (1991). A fortran language system for mutation‐based software testing. Software: Practice and Experience. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380210704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.