Cited by 40Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

A new radiodont (stem Euarthropoda) frontal appendage with a mosaic of characters from the Cambrian (Series 2 Stage 3) Chengjiang biota

Open access
Guo, Jin, Pates, Stephen, Cong, Peiyun, Daley, Allison C., Edgecombe, Gregory D., Chen, Taimin, Hou, Xianguang·2019·Papers in Palaeontology

Abstract

Abstract The classification of Radiodonta is primarily based on the morphology of their frontal appendages, a main feeding structure of this iconic group of mostly Cambrian stem‐group euarthropods. However, recent progress in the description and revision of radiodont taxa, particularly drawing on their frontal appendages, has exposed morphological variation that challenges reliable identification of higher‐level groupings. Here we describe a new taxon of Radiodonta, Laminacaris chimera gen. et sp. nov., from the Cambrian Series 2, Stage 3, Chengjiang biota of China, based on its unique frontal appendage morphology. Laminacaris is distinctive for its combination of characters shared by hurdiids and other early Cambrian radiodont families. Elongated, possibly unpaired endites on two proximal podomeres that bear small distally‐directed auxiliary spines oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the endite, are comparable with the elongated endites and their auxiliary spines of all known Cambrian members of Hurdiidae. In contrast, endites on more distal podomeres are similar to some species of Anomalocaris, and the dorsal spines at the distal end resemble those of Amplectobelua. The mosaic characters in the frontal appendage of Laminacaris chimera may capture morphology close to the divergence between the major radiodont groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/spp2.1231

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, J., Pates, S., Cong, P., Daley, A. C., Edgecombe, G. D., Chen, T., & Hou, X.
Affiliations
  • Yunnan University (CN)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • Management Committee of the Chengjiang Fossil Site World Heritage Chengjiang China
Corresponding author
  • Pates, Stephen
  • Cong, Peiyun
Venue
Papers in Palaeontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-13
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
99-110
ISSN
  • 2056-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 2056-2802
OpenAlex
W2885997390
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Papers in Palaeontology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572015, U1302232)
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG‐2015‐441)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
new genus and species, frontal appendages, Anomalocaris, Chengjiang biota, endites, Cambrian arthropods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review