Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cutaneous melanoma: Prognosis and treatment results worldwide

Balch, Charles M.·1992·Seminars in Surgical Oncology

Abstract

This first metanalysis of melanoma from treatment centers worldwide consisted of 15,798 patients with localized melanoma (stages I and II) and 2,116 stage II melanoma patients with nodal metastases. Comparisons of dominant prognostic variables showed consistent results from center to center, despite the heterogeneity of the patient population. Six of eight centers that performed a multivariate analysis ranked ulceration among the first three most dominant prognostic factors. Men had a higher proportion of ulcerated lesions than did women. There was a positive correlation between ulceration and thickness. Patients with melanoma of the scalp had a worse prognosis than did those with lesions of the face and neck; those with melanomas on the hands had a significantly worse prognosis than did those with lesions on the arms or legs. In this study, women had a statistically significant survival advantage over men. Their melanomas arose in more favorable sites, were thinner, and less ulcerative and had a lower stage of disease at presentation. Stage 111 melanomas were more common in males, thicker, and more ulcerated and had a nodular growth pattern. Patients with clinically occult nodal metastases detected by pathological examination and those with a single metastatic node fared the best. Five of six centers identified the number of metastatic nodes to be the most significant prognostic factor. Distant metastases (stage IV were analysed at only two centers, which found that the number and site of metastases appeared to be the dominant prognostic features of stage IV melanoma. When all factors were analyzed in a Cox regression analysis, the dominant factors for stage IV melanoma patients were (I) the number of metastatic sites, and (2) the remission duration. There were no histologic criteria of the primary melanomas that predicted the patient's clinical course once distant metastases had developed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ssu.2980080611

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Balch, C. M.
Venue
Seminars in Surgical Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-11
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
400-414
ISSN
  • 1098-2388 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-0437
OpenAlex
W2038048085
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cutaneous melanoma: Prognosis and treatment results worldwide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ssu.2980080611
The paper
Balch, C. M. (1992). Cutaneous melanoma: Prognosis and treatment results worldwide. Seminars in Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ssu.2980080611

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.