Cited by 417Endometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Figo stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: An analysis of 1973‐87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina

Kosary, Carol L.·1994·Seminars in Surgical Oncology

Abstract

The prognostic impact of FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race in survival for cancers of the female gynecological (cervix, endometrium, ovary, vulva, vagina) were examined using cases obtained from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program that were diagnosed between 1973 and 1987. Utilizing Cox proportional hazards modeling and relative survival rates analysis of 17,119 cases of cervical cancer indicated that the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histology, histological grade, lymph node status, and age at diagnosis were all independently prognostic. No evidence was found of survival differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Younger women were not found to have a poorer prognosis, survival declined with increased age. Analysis of 41,120 cases of endometrial cancer indicated that FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, lymph node status, age at diagnostic, and race were all prognostic factors. Clear cell adenocarcinoma, leiomyosarcoma, and mixed mullerian tumors were all found to have poorer prognosis. Analysis of 21,240 cases of ovarian cancer indicated that FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, lymph node status, age at diagnosis, presence of ascites, and race were all prognostically significant. Analysis of 2,575 cases of vulvar cancer indicated that FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age, and race were all prognostically significant. Analysis…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ssu.2980100107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kosary, C. L.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Kosary, Carol L.
Venue
Seminars in Surgical Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
31-46
ISSN
  • 1098-2388 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-0437
OpenAlex
W1992743577
Cited by
417
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Surgical Oncology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
FIGO stage, histologic grade, histology, age at diagnosis, race, prognostic factors, survival, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, vulvar cancer, vaginal cancer, lymph node status, clear cell adenocarcinoma, leiomyosarcoma, mixed Mullerian tumor, ascites, SEER
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Forecasting, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Lymphatic Metastasis, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Neoplasm Staging, Ovarian Neoplasms, Population Surveillance, Prognosis, Registries, United States, Vaginal Neoplasms, Vulvar Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Databases, Factual, Endometrial Neoplasms, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review