Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching
Open accessAbstract
A methodology is presented for Bayesian structural model updating using noisy incomplete modal data corresponding to natural frequencies and partial mode shapes of some of the modes of a structural system. The procedure can be used to find the most probable model within a specified class of structural models, based on the incomplete modal data, as well as the most probable values of the system natural frequencies and the full system mode shapes. The method does not require matching measured modes with corresponding modes from the structural model, which is in contrast to many existing methods. To find the most probable values of the structural model parameters and system modal parameters, the method uses an iterative scheme involving a series of coupled linear optimization problems. Furthermore, it does not require solving the eigenvalue problem of any structural model; instead, the eigenvalue equations appear in the prior probability distribution to provide soft constraints. The method appears to be computationally efficient and robust, judging from its successful application to noisy simulated data for a ten-storey building model and for a three-dimensional braced-frame model. This latter example is also used to demonstrate an application to structural health monitoring. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The simulated damage was successfully detected with improved accuracy compared with the Bayesian updating method in Yuen et al.
“The simulated damage was successfully detected with improved accuracy compared with the Bayesian updating method in Yuen et al. [202].”
From Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as [202]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hou, R., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Laplace approximation in sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection
Wang, X., Hou, R., Xia, Y., & Zhou, X. (2020) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106701 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yuen, K.-V., Beck, J. L., & Katafygiotis, L. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Macau (MO)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Yuen, Ka-Veng
- Venue
- Structural Control and Health Monitoring
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-107
- ISSN
- 1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2263
- OpenAlex
- W2064633509
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Structural Control and Health Monitoring (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- California Institute of Technology
- Universidade de Macau
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
- Keywords
- Bayesian model updating, incomplete modal data, natural frequencies, mode shapes, structural health monitoring, mode matching, linear programming, soft constraints, braced frames
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review