Cited by 208Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesControl Systems and IdentificationSeismic Performance and Analysis

Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching

Open access
Yuen, Ka-Veng, Beck, James L., Katafygiotis, Lambros S.·2006·Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Abstract

A methodology is presented for Bayesian structural model updating using noisy incomplete modal data corresponding to natural frequencies and partial mode shapes of some of the modes of a structural system. The procedure can be used to find the most probable model within a specified class of structural models, based on the incomplete modal data, as well as the most probable values of the system natural frequencies and the full system mode shapes. The method does not require matching measured modes with corresponding modes from the structural model, which is in contrast to many existing methods. To find the most probable values of the structural model parameters and system modal parameters, the method uses an iterative scheme involving a series of coupled linear optimization problems. Furthermore, it does not require solving the eigenvalue problem of any structural model; instead, the eigenvalue equations appear in the prior probability distribution to provide soft constraints. The method appears to be computationally efficient and robust, judging from its successful application to noisy simulated data for a ten-storey building model and for a three-dimensional braced-frame model. This latter example is also used to demonstrate an application to structural health monitoring. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/stc.144

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuen, K.-V., Beck, J. L., & Katafygiotis, L. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Corresponding author
Yuen, Ka-Veng
Venue
Structural Control and Health Monitoring
Published
2006-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
91-107
ISSN
  • 1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2263
OpenAlex
W2064633509
Cited by
208
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structural Control and Health Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Universidade de Macau
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
Keywords
Bayesian model updating, incomplete modal data, natural frequencies, mode shapes, structural health monitoring, mode matching, linear programming, soft constraints, braced frames

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review