Cited by 92Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesTransport Systems and TechnologyInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drive-by damage detection in bridges using the apparent profile

Open access
OBrien, E. J., Keenahan, J.·2015·Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Abstract

The concept of using sensors on a passing vehicle, rather than on the bridge, is known as 'Drive-by' damage detection. The newly developed traffic speed deflectometer (TSD) is a device used for pavement deflection measurements and is investigated here in numerical simulations as a means of bridge damage detection. A TSD vehicle model containing two displacement sensors is simulated crossing a simply supported finite element beam containing damage simulated as a loss in stiffness of one of the elements. An adapted Cross Entropy optimisation algorithm procedure is proposed to determine the apparent profile, where the displacements recorded by the sensors are used as the inputs. The time-shifted difference in the apparent profile is used as the damage indicator. Results show that this can be reliably used as a damage indicator in the presence of noise and changes in the transverse position of the vehicle on the bridge. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/stc.1721

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Ayenu-Prah, 2009, Comparison study of hilbert-huang transform, fourier transform and wavelet transform in pavement profile analysis, Vehicle System Dynamics, 47, 437, 10.1080/00423110802167466 · DOI
  2. Bathe, 1976, Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis
  3. Belay, 2008, Truck fleet model for design and assessment of flexible pavements, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 311, 1161, 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.10.019 · DOI
  4. De Boer, 2005, A tutorial on the cross-entropy method, Annals of Operations Research, 134, 19, 10.1007/s10479-005-5724-z · DOI
  5. Botev, 2005, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 529
  6. Briggs, 2000, Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli: Third Volume, 444, 10.1520/STP14783S · DOI
  7. Cebon, 1999, Handbook of Vehicle-Road Interaction
  8. Cebon, 1983, Artificial generation of road surface topography by the inverse F.F.T. method, Vehicle System Dynamics, 12, 160, 10.1080/00423118308968747 · DOI
  9. Cerda, 2012, Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resiliance and Sustainability (IABMAS2012), 346, 10.1201/b12352-43 · DOI
  10. Clough, 1975, Dynamics of Structures
  11. Dowling, 2012, Adaption of cross-entropy optimisation to a dynamic bridge WIM calibration problem, Engineering Structures, 44, 13, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.047 · DOI
  12. González A Covián E Madera J Determination of bridge natural frequencies using a moving vehicle instrumented with accelerometers and a geographical positioning system Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology Topping BHV Papadrakakis M Civil-Comp Press Stirlingshire, UK 2008
  13. González, 2012, Identification of damping in a bridge using a moving instrumented vehicle, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 331, 4115, 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.04.019 · DOI
  14. Harris, 2010, Characterisation of pavement profile heights using accelerometer readings and a combinatorial optimisation technique, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329, 497, 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.09.035 · DOI
  15. Harris, 2007, Reduction of bridge dynamic amplification through adjustment of vehicle suspension damping, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 302, 471, 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.11.020 · DOI
  16. He, 2012, Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resiliance and Sustainability, 392, 10.1201/b12352-50 · DOI
  17. Huang NE Shen S Long S Wu M Shih H et al The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonliner and nonstationary time series analysis Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 454 903 995 1998 · DOI
  18. Keenahan, 2014, The use of a dynamic truck-trailer drive-by system to monitor bridge damping, Structural Health Monitoring, 13, 183, 10.1177/1475921713513974 · DOI
  19. Kim, 2009, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR2009, 758
  20. Kim, 2004, Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis, Engineering Structures, 26, 347, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.10.008 · DOI
  21. Li, 2014, Optimization method based on Generalized Pattern Search Algorithm to identify bridge parameters indirectly by a passing vehicle, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 333, 364, 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.08.021 · DOI
  22. Lin, 2005, Use of a passing vehicle to scan the fundamental bridge frequencies: an experimental verification, Engineering Structures, 27, 1865, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.016 · DOI
  23. Lyons, 2011, Understanding Digital Signal Processing
  24. McGetrick, 2010a, Bridge and Concrete Research in Ireland
  25. McGetrick, 2009, Theoretical investigation of the use of a moving vehicle to identify bridge dynamic parameters, Insight: Non-Destructive Testing & Condition Monitoring, 51, 433, 10.1784/insi.2009.51.8.433 · DOI
  26. McGetrick, 2013, Dynamic axle force and road profile identification using a moving vehicle, International Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Construction, 2, 1, 10.7492/IJAEC.2013.001 · DOI
  27. OBrien EJ Keenahan J The analysis of short signal segments and its application to drive-by bridge inspections 2014 · DOI
  28. Oshima, 2008, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS2008, 3030
  29. Pines, 2006, Structural health monitoring using empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert phase, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 294, 97, 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.10.024 · DOI
  30. Qian, 1999, Joint time-frequency analysis, Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 16, 52, 10.1109/79.752051 · DOI
  31. Rubinstein, 2004, The Cross Entropy Method, 10.1007/978-1-4757-4321-0 · DOI
  32. Salvino, 2005, Hilbert-Huang Transform and its Applications, 227, 10.1142/9789812703347_0011 · DOI
  33. Sinha, 2002, Simplified models for the location of cracks in beam structures using measured vibration data, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 251, 13, 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3978 · DOI
  34. Staszewski, 2007, Time-frequency and time-scale analyses for structural health monitoring, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365, 449, 10.1098/rsta.2006.1936 · DOI
  35. Tedesco, 1999, Structural Dynamics: Theory and Applications
  36. Toshinami, 2010, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS2010, 317
  37. Weaver, 1987, Structural Dynamics by Finite Elements
  38. Yabe, 2012, Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resiliance and Sustainability (IABMAS2012), 195, 10.1201/b12352-21 · DOI
  39. Yang, 2004b, Vehicle-Bridge Interaction Dynamics: with Applications to High-Speed Railways, 10.1142/5541 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
OBrien, E. J., & Keenahan, J.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
OBrien, E. J.
Venue
Structural Control and Health Monitoring
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-14
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
813-825
ISSN
1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144290621
Cited by
92
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structural Control and Health Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (10US1856)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Transport Systems and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
bridge damage detection, traffic speed deflectometer, damage index, vehicle-mounted sensors, pavement deflection measurement, simply supported beams, stiffness loss, noise robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review