Cited by 212Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

A review of nonlinear dynamics applications to structural health monitoring

Worden, Keith, Farrar, Charles R., Haywood, Jonathan, Todd, Michael·2008·Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Abstract

The process of implementing a damage detection strategy for aerospace, civil and mechanical engineering infrastructure is referred to as structural health monitoring (SHM). In many cases damage causes a structure that initially behaves in a predominantly linear manner to exhibit nonlinear response when subject to its operating environment. The formation of cracks that subsequently open and close under operating loads is an example of such damage. The damage detection process can be significantly enhanced if one takes advantage of these nonlinear effects when extracting damage-sensitive features from measured data. This paper will provide a review of examples from nonlinear dynamical systems theory and from nonlinear system identification techniques that are used for the feature-extraction portion of the damage detection process. This paper is not intended as a comprehensive review of all damage detection methods rooted in nonlinear dynamics, but rather to provide a number of illustrations of complimentary approaches where damage-sensitive data features are based on nonlinear system response. These features, in turn, can either be used as a direct diagnosis of damage or as input to statistical damage classifier. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/stc.215

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Worden, K., Farrar, C. R., Haywood, J., & Todd, M.
Affiliations
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Structural Control and Health Monitoring
Published
2008
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
540-567
ISSN
  • 1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2263
OpenAlex
W2098312962
Cited by
212
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Structural Control and Health Monitoring (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Keywords
structural health monitoring, damage detection, nonlinear dynamics, nonlinear system identification, damage-sensitive features, crack formation, nonlinear structural response, damage classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review