The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convolutional neural networks for automated damage recognition and damage type identification
Open accessAbstract
Recurring expenses associated with preventative maintenance and inspection produce operational inefficiencies and unnecessary spending. Human inspectors may submit inaccurate damage assessments and physically inaccessible locations, like underground mining structures, and pose additional logistical challenges. Automated systems and computer vision can significantly reduce these challenges and streamline preventative maintenance and inspection. The authors propose a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approach to identify the presence and type of structural damage. CNN is a deep feed-forward artificial neural network that utilizes learnable convolutional filters to identify distinguishing patterns present in images. CNN is invariant to image scale, location, and noise, which makes it robust to classify damage of different sizes or shapes. The proposed approach is validated with synthetic data of a composite sandwich panel with debonding damage, and crack damage recognition is demonstrated on real concrete bridge crack images. CNN outperforms several other machine learning algorithms in completing the same task. The authors conclude that CNN is an effective tool for the detection and type identification of damage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Fukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning
Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01578 · Cited by 3,974
Learning Hierarchical Features for Scene Labeling
Farabet, C., Couprie, C., Najman, L., & LeCun, Y. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.231 · Cited by 2,620
Practical Recommendations for Gradient-Based Training of Deep Architectures
Bengio, Y. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_26 · Cited by 2,259
Cited by
Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A., & Pekcan, G. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102778 · Cited by 769
Yang, J., Yang, F., Zhou, Y., Wang, D., Li, R., Wang, G., & Chen, W. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.02.064 · Cited by 100
He, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, Z., & Li, C. Y. (2023) · Engineering with Computers · doi:10.1007/s00366-021-01584-4 · Cited by 73
Gao, C., Zhang, Q., Tan, Z., Zhao, G., Gao, S., Kim, E., & Shen, T. (2024) · Heritage Science · doi:10.1186/s40494-024-01144-1 · Cited by 39
Kohiyama, M., Oka, K., & Yamashita, T. (2020) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.2552 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Modarres, C., Astorga, N., Droguett, E. L., & Meruane, V.
- Venue
- Structural Control and Health Monitoring
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e2230
- ISSN
- 1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2862109938
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
