Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable-supported bridges

Wong, Kai-Yuen·2004·Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Abstract

Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable-supported bridges in Hong Kong involve the integration of instrumentation, analytical and information technologies with knowledge and experiences in design, construction, operation and maintenance of cable-supported bridges for continuous monitoring of performance throughout their life-span. A bridge health monitoring system, called the WASHMS (wind and structural health monitoring system) has been devised and operated by Highways Department to monitor the structure conditions of the Tsing Ma (suspension) Bridge, the Kap Shui Mun (cable-stayed) Bridge and the Ting Kau (cable-stayed) Bridge. The main objective of instrumentation and health monitoring is to detect and evaluate any symptoms of operational anomalies and/or deterioration or damage that may induce adverse effects on service or safety reliability through the processing and analysis of data collected from transducers and sensors. This WASHMS is composed of six modules, namely, the sensory system, the data acquisition and transmission system, the data processing and control system, the bridge health evaluation system, the portable data acquisition system and the portable inspection and maintenance system. The monitoring items are in general classified into three categories, namely, the loading sources (or input parameters) which include: wind, temperature, traffic (highway and railway) and seismic loadings; system characteristics (or system parameters) which include: static influence coefficients and global dynamic characteristics; and bridge responses (or output parameters) which include: variation in geometric configuration (or displacements of the bridges), stress/strain distribution, cable forces and fatigue stress estimation. This paper introduces the system architecture of the WASHMS with a brief functional description of each module. Categorization of the monitoring parameters and corresponding monitoring procedures are also outlined. The applications of the monitoring results are illustrated by some typical graphical plots such as wind-rose diagrams, spectral analysis, bogie loading and remaining fatigue life assessment. For successful design and operation of a bridge health monitoring system, conclusions are drawn with reference to the integration of knowledge and experience in four aspects: (i) design, construction, operation and maintenance of long-span bridges; (ii) instrumentation technologies for collection and processing of data; (iii) graphical CAD and numerical analytical technologies for modeling and analysis; and (iv) information technologies for transmission, processing and visualization of data. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/stc.33

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 307

Metadata

Authors
Wong, K.-Y.
Venue
Structural Control and Health Monitoring
Published
2004-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
91-124
ISSN
  • 1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2263
OpenAlex
W1976695286
Cited by
307
References
0
FWCI
27.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable-supported bridges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/stc.33
The paper
Wong, K.-Y. (2004). Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable-supported bridges. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.33

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.