Integration-Free Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Model Genetic and Neural Developmental Features of Down Syndrome Etiology
Abstract
Down syndrome (DS) is the most frequent cause of human congenital mental retardation. Cognitive deficits in DS result from perturbations of normal cellular processes both during development and in adult tissues, but the mechanisms underlying DS etiology remain poorly understood. To assess the ability of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to model DS phenotypes, as a prototypical complex human disease, we generated bona fide DS and wild-type (WT) nonviral iPSCs by episomal reprogramming. DS iPSCs selectively overexpressed chromosome 21 genes, consistent with gene dosage, which was associated with deregulation of thousands of genes throughout the genome. DS and WT iPSCs were neurally converted at >95% efficiency and had remarkably similar lineage potency, differentiation kinetics, proliferation, and axon extension at early time points. However, at later time points DS cultures showed a twofold bias toward glial lineages. Moreover, DS neural cultures were up to two times more sensitive to oxidative stress-induced apoptosis, and this could be prevented by the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine. Our results reveal a striking complexity in the genetic alterations caused by trisomy 21 that are likely to underlie DS developmental phenotypes, and indicate a central role for defective early glial development in establishing developmental defects in DS brains. Furthermore, oxidative stress sensitivity is likely to contribute to the accelerated neurodegeneration seen in DS, and we provide proof of concept for screening corrective therapeutics using DS iPSCs and their derivatives. Nonviral DS iPSCs can therefore model features of complex human disease in vitro and provide a renewable and ethically unencumbered discovery platform.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neurons derived from fetal Down syndrome neural progenitor cells are more sensitive to reactive oxygen species than those of controls, which may indicate a vulnerability to cell death.
“However, neurons derived from fetal DS NPCs are more sensitive to reactive oxygen species96 than those of controls, which may indicate a vulnerability to cell death.”
From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [96]
Analyses of neural progenitor cells arising from trisomy 21 induced pluripotent stem cells have provided conflicting data, with some suggesting that apoptosis is increased and others seeing no effect.
“Analyses of NPCs arising from T21 iPSCs have provided conflicting data, with some suggesting that apoptosis is increased74,79,95 and others seeing no effect75,77,81,96.”
From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [96]
When cultured long enough to enable the generation of astrocytes, trisomy 21 induced pluripotent stem cells generate more astrocytes than control induced pluripotent stem cells, concomitant with a reduction in the generation of neurons.
“Similarly, when cultured for long enough to enable the generation of astrocytes, T21 iPSCs generate more of this cell type than control iPSCs, concomitant with a reduction in the generation of neurons79,82,96,103.”
From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [96]
Trisomic iPSCs show significant increase in astrocyte differentiation.
“A significant increase in astrocytes differentiated from trisomic iPSCs has been reported many times (Briggs et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2014; Hibaoui et al., 2014; Real et al., 2018; Mollo et al., 2021).”
From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Briggs et al., 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 151
- Authors
- Briggs, J. A., Sun, J., Shepherd, J., Ovchinnikov, D. A., Chung, T.-L., Nayler, S. P., Kao, L.-P., Morrow, C. A., Thakar, N. Y., Soo, S.-Y., Peura, T., Grimmond, S., & Wolvetang, E. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- StemCore, Australian Stem Cell Centre, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Corresponding author
- Wolvetang, Ernst J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Stem Cells
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-02-25
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 467-478
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2025012646
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Stem Cells (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Katia Nones
- Drew Titmarsh
- Othmar Korn
- Queensland Government and Lejeune Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, induced pluripotent stem cells, disease modeling, neuronal differentiation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, N-acetylcysteine, neurodegeneration, gene dosage, cognitive impairment
- MeSH terms
- Cell Differentiation, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Male, Neurons, Neurites, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Gene Dosage, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Neurogenesis, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review