The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Signaling Pathways Controlling Pluripotency and Early Cell Fate Decisions of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Open accessAbstract
Human pluripotent stem cells from embryonic origins and those generated from reprogrammed somatic cells share many characteristics, including indefinite proliferation and a sustained capacity to differentiate into a wide variety of cell types. However, it remains to be demonstrated whether both cell types rely on similar mechanisms to maintain their pluripotent status and to control their differentiation. Any differences in such mechanisms would suggest that reprogramming of fibroblasts to generate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) results in novel states of pluripotency. In that event, current methods for expanding and differentiating human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) might not be directly applicable to human iPSCs. However, we show here that human iPSCs rely on activin/nodal signaling to control Nanog expression and thereby maintain pluripotency, thus revealing their mechanistic similarity to human ESCs. We also show that growth factors necessary and sufficient for achieving specification of human ESCs into extraembryonic tissues, neuroectoderm, and mesendoderm also drive differentiation of human iPSCs into the same tissues. Importantly, these experiments were performed in fully chemically defined medium devoid of factors that could obscure analysis of developmental mechanisms or render the resulting tissues incompatible with future clinical applications. Together these data reveal that human iPSCs rely on mechanisms similar to human ESCs to maintain their pluripotency and to control their differentiation, showing that these pluripotent cell types are functionally equivalent. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells
Yu, J., Vodyanik, M. A., Smuga-Otto, K., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Frane, J. L., Tian, S., Nie, J., Jonsdottir, G. A., Ruotti, V., Stewart, R., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151526 · Cited by 10,310
Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling
Chambers, S. M., Fasano, C. A., Papapetrou, E. P., Tomishima, M., Sadelain, M., & Studer, L. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1529 · Cited by 3,620
Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population
Yang, L., Soonpaa, M. H., Adler, E. D., Roepke, T. K., Kattman, S. J., Kennedy, M., Henckaerts, E., Bonham, K., Abbott, G. W., Linden, R. M., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06894 · Cited by 1,389
Cited by
Human cerebral cortex development from pluripotent stem cells to functional excitatory synapses
Shi, Y., Kirwan, P., Smith, J., Robinson, H. P. C., & Livesey, F. J. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3041 · Cited by 813
The Cell-Cycle State of Stem Cells Determines Cell Fate Propensity
Pauklin, S., & Vallier, L. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.031 · Cited by 623
Self-citationModeling inherited metabolic disorders of the liver using human induced pluripotent stem cells
Rashid, S. T., Corbineau, S., Hannan, N., Marciniak, S. J., Miranda, E., Alexander, G., Huang-Doran, I., Griffin, J., Ahrlund-Richter, L., Skepper, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci43122 · Cited by 606
Self-citationCommon genetic variation drives molecular heterogeneity in human iPSCs
Kilpinen, H., Goncalves, A., Leha, A., Afzal, V., Alasoo, K., Ashford, S., Bala, S., Bensaddek, D., Casale, F. P., Culley, O. J., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22403 · Cited by 586
Self-citationProduction of hepatocyte-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells
Hannan, N. R. F., Segeritz, C.-P., Touboul, T., & Vallier, L. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.153 · Cited by 338
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vallier, L., Touboul, T., Brown, S., Cho, C., Bilican, B., Alexander, M., Cedervall, J., Chandran, S., Ährlund-Richter, L., Weber, A., & Pedersen, R. A.
- Venue
- Stem Cells
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-08-17
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2655-2666
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2112194595
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.