Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intramuscular Transplantation of G-CSF-Mobilized CD34+ Cells in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Phase I/IIa, Multicenter, Single-Blinded, Dose-Escalation Clinical Trial

Kawamoto, Atsuhiko, Katayama, Minako, Handa, Nobuhiro, Kinoshita, Makoto, Takano, Haruna, Horii, Miki, Sadamoto, Kazuyo, Yokoyama, Ayumi, Yamanaka, Takeharu, Onodera, Rie, Kuroda, Akiko, Baba, Rie, Kaneko, Yuichiro, Tsukie, Tomio, Kurimoto, Yasuo, Okada, Yukikatsu, Kihara, Yasuki, Morioka, Shigefumi, Fukushima, Masanori, Asahara, Takayuki·2009·Stem Cells

Abstract

A number of preclinical studies have indicated the therapeutic potential of endothelial progenitor cells for vascular regeneration in ischemic diseases. A phase I/IIa clinical trial of transplantation of autologous CD34+ cells, the endothelial and hematopoietic progenitor-enriched fraction, was performed in no-option patients with atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease or Buerger's disease with critical limb ischemia (CLI). CD34+ cells were isolated from the G-CSF-mobilized apheresis product using a magnetic cell sorting system. CD34+ cells (105/kg, n = 6; 5 × 105/kg, n = 8; or 106/kg, n = 3) were injected i.m. into the leg with more severe ischemia. The Efficacy Score, representing changes in the toe brachial pressure index (TBPI), Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale, and total walking distance 12 weeks after cell transplantation, the primary endpoint, was positive, indicating improvement in limb ischemia in all patients, although no significant dose-response relationship was observed. During the 12-week observation after cell therapy, the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale, TBPI, transcutaneous partial oxygen pressure, total or pain-free walking distance, and ulcer size serially improved in all patients. No death or major amputation occurred, and severe adverse events were rare, although mild to moderate events relating to G-CSF and leukapheresis were frequent during the 12-week follow-up. In conclusion, the outcomes of this prospective clinical study indicate the safety and feasibility of CD34+ cell therapy in patients with CLI. Favorable trends in efficacy parameters encourage a randomized and controlled trial in the future. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/stem.207

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Kawamoto, A., Katayama, M., Handa, N., Kinoshita, M., Takano, H., Horii, M., Sadamoto, K., Yokoyama, A., Yamanaka, T., Onodera, R., Kuroda, A., Baba, R., Kaneko, Y., Tsukie, T., Kurimoto, Y., Okada, Y., Kihara, Y., Morioka, S., Fukushima, M., & Asahara, T.
Venue
Stem Cells
Published
2009-08-26
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
2857-2864
ISSN
  • 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-4918
OpenAlex
W2023447789
Cited by
247
References
2
FWCI
16.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.