Cited by 452Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

“Nonhedonic” food motivation in humans involves dopamine in the dorsal striatum and methylphenidate amplifies this effect

Volkow, Nora D., Wang, Gene‐Jack, Fowler, Joanna S., Logan, Jean, Jayne, Millard, Franceschi, Dinko, Wong, Cristopher, Gatley, Samuel J. +3 more·2002·Synapse

Abstract

The drive for food is one of the most powerful of human and animal behaviors. Dopamine, a neurotransmitter involved with motivation and reward, its believed to regulate food intake in laboratory animals by modulating its rewarding effects through the nucleus accumbens (NA). Here we assess the involvement of dopamine in “nonhedonic” food motivation in humans. Changes in extracellular dopamine in striatum in response to nonhedonic food stimulation (display of food without consumption) were evaluated in 10 food‐deprived subjects (16–20 h) using positron emission tomography (PET) and [11 C]raclopride (a D2 receptor radioligand that competes with endogenous dopamine for binding to the receptor). To amplify the dopamine changes we pretreated subjects with methylphenidate (20 mg p.o.), a drug that blocks dopamine transporters (mechanism for removal of extracellular dopamine). Although the food stimulation when preceded by placebo did not increase dopamine or the desire for food, the food stimulation when preceded by methylphenidate (20 mg p.o.) did. The increases in extracellular dopamine were significant in dorsal (P < 0.005) but not in ventral striatum (area that included NA) and were significantly correlated with the increases in self‐reports of hunger and desire for food (P < 0.01). These results provide the first evidence that dopamine in the dorsal striatum is involved in food motivation in humans that is distinct from its role in regulating reward through the NA. In addition it demonstrates the ability of methylphenidate to amplify weak dopamine signals. Synapse 44:175–180, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/syn.10075

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 452

Authors
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G., Fowler, J. S., Logan, J., Jayne, M., Franceschi, D., Wong, C., Gatley, S. J., Gifford, A. N., Ding, Y., & Pappas, N.
Affiliations
Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Volkow, Nora D.
Venue
Synapse
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03-12
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
175-180
ISSN
  • 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2396
OpenAlex
W2057683939
Cited by
452
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 42
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Synapse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da009490-08)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 09490-01, DA-06278, R01DA006278)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
dopamine, dorsal striatum, methylphenidate, extracellular dopamine, [11C]raclopride, food deprivation, hunger, nucleus accumbens, food reward
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Hunger, Male, Methylphenidate, Motivation, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review