Cited by 11Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Effects of amphetamine on subcellular distribution of dopamine and DOPAC

Wallace, Lane J.·2012·Synapse

Abstract

Amphetamine effects on distribution of dopamine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), and amphetamine in vesicular, cytosolic, and extracellular compartments associated with a striatal varicosity were estimated through use of a computer simulation model. In addition, contribution to overall effects of amphetamine by each of five actions--transport by dopamine transporter (DAT), transport by vesicular monoamine transporter, stimulation of reverse transport, inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO), and slowing of dopamine cell firing rate--were evaluated. Amphetamine enters a varicosity almost entirely by DAT and accumulates to very high levels within the varicosity. Both reverse transport by DAT and passive diffusion contribute to continual amphetamine egress across the plasma membrane. Amphetamine enters storage vesicles by both transport and diffusion. The transport portion competes with dopamine storage, resulting in redistribution of approximately half of dopamine from vesicles to cytosol. The high concentration of amphetamine in the cytosol inhibits MAO, protecting cytosolic dopamine. A very small fraction of cytosolic dopamine is moved to extracellular compartment via reverse transport by DAT. The amount of dopamine moved by reverse transport is limited because of competition by very high cytosolic levels of amphetamine. In the presence of amphetamine, rate of dopamine transfer to extracellular compartment is less than control; however, high levels of extracellular dopa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/syn.21546

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallace, L. J.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wallace, Lane J.
Venue
Synapse
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-27
Volume
66
Issue
7
Pages
592-607
ISSN
  • 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2396
OpenAlex
W2049204004
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Synapse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
amphetamine, dopamine, DOPAC, dopamine transporter, reverse transport, vesicular monoamine transporter, monoamine oxidase inhibition, subcellular localization, computer simulation model, dopamine reuptake
MeSH terms
Amphetamines, Computer Simulation, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Models, Neurological, 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid, Intracellular Space, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, Vesicular Monoamine Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review