Cited by 32Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Development of dopamine‐beta hydroxylase—positive fiber innervation of the rat hippocampus

Moudy, Anna M., Kunkel, Dennis D., Schwartzkroin, Philip A.·1993·Synapse

Abstract

Development of the noradrenergic fiber innervation of the rat hippocampus by the locus coeruleus was examined immunohistochemically in fixed tissue from animals aged 4 days through 55 days postnatal. The presence of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH) immunoreactive cells and fibers was evaluated in sections of hippocampus and locus coeruleus. Large, multipolar TH- and DBH-positive cells with long beaded fibers were visible within locus coeruleus at all ages; no immunopositive cell bodies were found in hippocampus. In hippocampal sections from mature animals (PN55), the highest density of DBH-stained fibers was found in stratum lucidum of CA3 and in the hilus and inner molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. Whereas similar patterns of fiber positivity were found at PN21 and PN10 (although with somewhat reduced density of immunopositive fibers), the pattern was quite different at PN4. Although fiber staining was relatively sparse at PN4, relative density of DBH fibers was highest in stratum radiatum of CA1 and subiculum. This change in staining pattern suggests that noradrenergic function in hippocampus may change as the rat matures. Double immunofluorescence techniques showed an overlap of DBH and TH positive fibers in all hippocampal regions at all ages. DBH immunostaining appeared to be somewhat more sensitive than the TH staining. These data made it impossible to confirm the presence of significant numbers of nonnoradrenergic, catecholamine-contain…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/syn.890150407

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moudy, A. M., Kunkel, D. D., & Schwartzkroin, P. A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Moudy, Anna M.
Venue
Synapse
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
307-318
ISSN
  • 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2396
OpenAlex
W2094210565
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Synapse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute of Museum and Library Services
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns015317-14, 5f32ns008639-02)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS NS18895, NINDS NS15317, NINDS NS08639, R01NS018895)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
dopamine beta-hydroxylase, noradrenergic innervation, hippocampus, locus coeruleus, tyrosine hydroxylase, postnatal development, CA3, dentate gyrus, subiculum, CA1
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Dopamine beta-Hydroxylase, Female, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Hippocampus, Locus Coeruleus, Nerve Fibers, Tissue Distribution, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review