The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methamphetamine‐induced neurotoxicity: Roles for glutamate and dopamine efflux
Abstract
The neurotoxic effect of methamphetamine (METH) on striatal dopaminergic neurons have been hypothesized to be mediated by excess dopamine (DA) release. In addition, N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists block METH‐induced DA depletions. This suggests that glutamate also mediates the toxic effects of METH. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that DA and glutamate efflux contribute to METH‐inducted neurotoxicity. In vivo microdialysis in rats was used to measure extracellular concentrations of striatal DA and glutamate following 3 injections of METH (10 mg/kg, i.p.), each injection given 2 hours apart. One week following the dialysis experiment, rats were sacrificed and the ventral lateral striata were assayed for DA content. Glutamate concentrations in the dialysate increased by over 4‐fold after the third METH injection. In these same animals, striatal DA tissue content was significantly depleted. In separate groups of rats, pretreatment with haloperidol (2 mg/kg at the first METH injection) significantly increased METH‐induced DA efflux. The haloperidel pretreatment attenuated the extracellular increase in glutamate produced by METH and blocked subsequent neurotoxicity to DA neurons. In contrast, pretreatment with the DA uptake blocker, GBR‐12909 (10 mg/kg, 30 min before each METH injection) significantly attenuated the increased DA release produced by METH but did not change glutamate efflux. However, pretreatment with GBR‐12909 did protect against the tissue content depletion of DA in the striatum. Based on these findings, it appears that increased DA and glutamate release in the striatum are important and possibly interact in the development of METH‐induced neurotoxicity. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of excitatory amino acids in behavioral sensitization to psychomotor stimulants
Wolf, M. E. (1998) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00090-7 · Cited by 934
Berman, S. B., & Hastings, T. G. (1999) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0731127.x · Cited by 664
Davidson, C., Gow, A. J., Lee, T. H., & Ellinwood, E. H. (2001) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00054-6 · Cited by 521
Glutamatergic substrates of drug addiction and alcoholism
Gass, J. T., & Olive, M. F. (2008) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.039 · Cited by 484
LaVoie, M. J., & Hastings, T. G. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-04-01484.1999 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephans, S. E., & Yamamoto, B. K.
- Venue
- Synapse
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-209
- ISSN
- 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2396
- OpenAlex
- W2073422014
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methamphetamine‐induced neurotoxicity: Roles for glutamate and dopamine efflux. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/syn.890170310
- The paper
- Stephans, S. E., & Yamamoto, B. K. (1994). Methamphetamine‐induced neurotoxicity: Roles for glutamate and dopamine efflux. Synapse. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.890170310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.