Cited by 162Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

When Did Life Likely Emerge on Earth in an RNA‐First Process?

Open access
Benner, Steven A., Bell, Elizabeth A., Biondi, Elisa, Brasser, Ramon, Carell, Thomas, Kim, Hyo‐Joong, Mojzsis, Stephen J., Omran, Arthur +2 more·2020·ChemSystemsChem

Abstract

The widespread presence of ribonucleic acid (RNA) catalysts and cofactors in the Earth′s biosphere today suggests that RNA was the first biopolymer to support Darwinian evolution. However, most “path‐hypotheses” to generate building blocks for RNA require reduced nitrogen‐containing compounds not made in useful amounts in the CO 2 −N 2 −H 2 O atmospheres of the Hadean. We review models for Earth′s impact history that invoke a single ∼10 23 kg impactor (Moneta) to account for measured amounts of platinum, gold, and other siderophilic (“iron‐loving”) elements on the Earth and Moon. If it were the last sterilizing impactor, by reducing the atmosphere but not the mantle Moneta, would have opened a “window of opportunity” for RNA synthesis, a period when RNA precursors rained from the atmosphere onto land holding oxidized minerals that stabilize advanced RNA precursors and RNA. Surprisingly, this combination of physics, geology, and chemistry suggests a time when RNA formation was most probable, ∼120±100 million years after Moneta′s impact, or ∼4.36±0.1 billion years ago. Uncertainties in this time are driven by uncertainties in rates of productive atmosphere loss and amounts of sub‐aerial land.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/syst.201900035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The appearance of RNA molecules could have occurred around 4.36 ± 0.1 billion years ago.

    “Based on multiple models of the early Earth and its impact history, it has been estimated that the appearance of RNA molecules could have occurred around 4.36 ± 0.1 billion years ago”

    From The Emergence of Life (2019) · cites this paper as Benner et al. 2019

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 181 · Cited by 162

Authors
Benner, S. A., Bell, E. A., Biondi, E., Brasser, R., Carell, T., Kim, H., Mojzsis, S. J., Omran, A., Pasek, M. A., & Trail, D.
Affiliations
  • Firebird Biomolecular Sciences (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution (US)
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Benner, Steven A.
Venue
ChemSystemsChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-24
Volume
2
Issue
2
ISSN
2570-4206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970410309
Cited by
162
References
181
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ChemSystemsChem (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (54466)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
origin of life, mineral catalysis, carbonyl species, reducing atmosphere, prebiotic chemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review