Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4Origins and Evolution of LifeMachine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computational Studies of Prebiotic Chemistry at the Age of Machine Learning: From Recent Breakthroughs to Future Revolutions

Open access
Anton, Olaia, Stirnemann, Guillaume·2026·ChemSystemsChem

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The emergence of life from abiotic chemical systems remains a central and unresolved question in natural sciences. Understanding how simple molecules gave rise to the first biomolecules and self‐sustaining reaction networks requires integrating scarce experimental data with advanced computational methods. Machine learning (ML) is rapidly transforming research in prebiotic chemistry. In particular, ML‐based interatomic potentials enable the exploration of complex reaction mechanisms at near‐quantum accuracy and reduced computational cost. Beyond individual reactions, ML methods can also accelerate the study of chemical reaction networks by predicting transition states, reaction outcomes, and kinetic parameters. Here, we highlight recent methodological and conceptual advances, illustrating how ML complements traditional quantum chemical approaches. We further discuss emerging strategies for integrating data‐driven models with experimental and theoretical frameworks, expanding the scope and efficiency of research into the chemical origins of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/syst.202500057

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. B. M.Wood M.Dzamba X.Fu et al. “UMA: A Family of Universal Models for Atoms ”arXiv preprint(2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.23971. · DOI
  2. 10.26434/chemrxiv‐2025‐hpdmg · DOI
  3. 10.1088/2632-2153/abc81d · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41586-024-07193-7 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Anton, O., & Stirnemann, G.
Affiliations
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
Corresponding author
Stirnemann, Guillaume
Venue
ChemSystemsChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
2570-4206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7124186661
Cited by
4
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
9.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • ChemSystemsChem (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (757111)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
prebiotic chemistry, origin of life, machine learning interatomic potentials, reaction mechanism, reaction kinetics, chemical reaction networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Studies of Prebiotic Chemistry at the Age of Machine Learning: From Recent Breakthroughs to Future Revolutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/syst.202500057
The paper
Anton, O., & Stirnemann, G. (2026). Computational Studies of Prebiotic Chemistry at the Age of Machine Learning: From Recent Breakthroughs to Future Revolutions. ChemSystemsChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/syst.202500057

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.