The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic relationships in the order Cucurbitales and a new classification of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae)
Abstract
We analysed phylogenetic relationships in the order Cucurbitales using 14 DNA regions from the three plant genomes: the mitochondrial nad1 b/c intron and matR gene, the nuclear ribosomal 18S, ITS1‐5.8S‐ITS2, and 28S genes, and the plastid rbcL, matK, ndhF, atpB, trnL, trnL‐trnF, rpl20‐rps12, trnS‐trnG and trnH‐psbA genes, spacers, and introns. The dataset includes 664 ingroup species, representating all but two genera and over 25% of the ca. 2600 species in the order. Maximum likelihood analyses yielded mostly congruent topologies for the datasets from the three genomes. Relationships among the eight families of Cucurbitales were: (Apodanthaceae, Anisophylleaceae, (Cucurbitaceae, ((Coriariaceae, Corynocarpaceae), (Tetramelaceae, (Datiscaceae, Begoniaceae))))). Based on these molecular data and morphological data from the literature, we recircumscribe tribes and genera within Cucurbitaceae and present a more natural classification for this family. Our new system comprises 95 genera in 15 tribes, five of them new: Actinostemmateae, Indofevilleeae, Thladiantheae, Momordiceae, and Siraitieae. Formal naming requires 44 new combinations and two new names in Cucurbitaceae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6872 · Cited by 12,728
jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging
Posada, D. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msn083 · Cited by 10,499
A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers
Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., & Rougemont, J. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150802429642 · Cited by 7,028
MacClade 4.0: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-2183 · Cited by 5,554
MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment
Katoh, K. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki198 · Cited by 4,837
An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants
Schmid, R., & Cronquist, A. (1995) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1222465 · Cited by 3,244
Flowering Plants. Eudicots: Malpighiales
(2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39417-1 · Cited by 2,936
Holmgren, P. K. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,676
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaefer, H., & Renner, S. S.
- Venue
- TAXON
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-138
- ISSN
- 0040-0262 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-8175
- OpenAlex
- W2911449751
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic relationships in the order Cucurbitales and a new classification of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tax.601011
- The paper
- Schaefer, H., & Renner, S. S. (2011). Phylogenetic relationships in the order Cucurbitales and a new classification of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae). TAXON. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.601011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.