The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Can middle‐school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life science
Abstract
The transfer of matter and energy from one organism to another and between organisms and their physical setting is a fundamental concept in life science. Not surprisingly, this concept is common to the Benchmarks for Science Literacy (American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993 ), the National Science Education Standards (National Research Council, 1996 ), and most state frameworks and likely to appear in any middle‐school science curriculum material. Nonetheless, while topics such as photosynthesis and cellular respiration have been taught for many years, research on student learning indicates that students have difficulties learning these ideas. In this study, nine middle‐school curriculum materials—both widely used and newly developed—were examined in detail for their support of student learning ideas concerning matter and energy transformations in ecosystems specified in the national standards documents. The analysis procedure used in this study was previously developed and field tested by Project 2061 of the AAAS on a variety of curriculum materials. According to our findings, currently available curriculum materials provide little support for the attainment of the key ideas chosen for this study. In general, these materials do not take into account students' prior knowledge, lack representations to clarify abstract ideas, and are deficient in phenomena that can be explained by the key ideas and hence can make them plausible. This article concludes with a d…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 234
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.1002/tea.3660290203 · DOI
- Agnes M.E., 2001, Webster's New World College Dictionary
- AAAS, 1989, Science for all Americans
- AAAS, 1993, Benchmarks for science literacy
- AAAS, 2001, Atlas for science literacy
- AAAS, 2001, Project 2061 AAAS science textbook conference [CD‐ROM]
- AAAS, 2004, Resources for science literacy: Curriculum materials
- 10.1002/tea.3660270806 · DOI
- Anderson C.W., 1987, The educator's handbook: A research perspective, 84
- Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1997, Education update
- Ball D.L., 1996, Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?, Educational Researcher, 25, 8
- 10.2307/1179386 · DOI
- 10.1080/0950069890110105 · DOI
- Bell B., 1984, Aspects of secondary students' understanding of plant nutrition
- Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, 1999, Middle School Science & Technology
- 10.1002/tea.3660270503 · DOI
- Brearton M.A., 1999, Racing a comet, Journal of Staff Development, 20, 30
- 10.1080/09500690110098868 · DOI
- 10.1080/09500690110098877 · DOI
- Champagne A., 1985, Cognitive structure and conceptual change, 61
- 10.4324/9780203823583 · DOI
- 10.1086/461370 · DOI
- Education Market Research, 1998, Elementary and middle‐school science market: Teaching methods, materials used and needed, and market size
- Feltovich P.J., 1989, Similarity and analogical reasoning, 498
- 10.1002/tea.3660280907 · DOI
- Hammrich P.(1997 March).Teaching for excellence: Using Project 2061 Benchmarks for more effective science instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Oak Brook IL. · DOI
- 10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<655::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- Johnstone A.H., 1982, The demands of practical work, Education in Chemistry, 19, 71
- 10.1023/A:1016608830552 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.10035 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.10095 · DOI
- Kulm G., 1998, Mathematics curriculum materials reliability study
- 10.1080/0950069960180102 · DOI
- 10.1080/0950069960180201 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.3660300304 · DOI
- 10.1119/1.16539 · DOI
- National Educational Goals Panel, 1994, Data volume for the National Education Goals Report (Vol. 1)
- NRC, 1996, National science education standards
- NRC, 2000, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school
- 10.1002/tea.3660270105 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.3660270307 · DOI
- Roseman J., 1997, Implementing benchmarks and standards: Lessons from Project 2061, The Science Teacher, 64, 26
- Roth K., 1997, Food for plants: Student text and teacher's guide. Institute for Research on Teaching
- Roth K.(2001 February).Student‐focused curriculum materials development: The case of “Food for Plants.”Paper presented at the AAAS Project 2061 Science Textbook Conference Washington DC.
- Roth K., 1987, The power plant: Teacher's guide to photosynthesis (Occasional Paper No. 112)
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199803)35:3<265::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
- Schmidt W., 1997, Executive summary. A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education
- Schneps M.H., 1988, A private universe. Program 2. Biology: Lessons pulled from thin air [videotape]
- 10.1002/tea.10106 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.3660250504 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.3660300202 · DOI
- Spiro R.J., 1994, Theoretical models and processes of reading, 602
- 10.1002/tea.3660280404 · DOI
- 10.1080/0950069870090111 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.10050 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.10107 · DOI
- Stern L., 2001, Textbooks alignment, The Science Teacher, 68, 52
- Strike K., 1985, Cognitive structure and conceptual change, 211
- 10.1002/tea.3660290603 · DOI
- Tyson‐Bernstein H., 1988, America's textbook fiasco: A conspiracy of good intentions
- 10.1002/tea.3660230703 · DOI
- White R., 1992, Probing understanding
- 10.1002/tea.3660200506 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- American Association For The Advancement of Science (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stern, Luli
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-28
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 538-568
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2074343858
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 34.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- middle school science textbooks, ecosystems, photosynthesis, cellular respiration, Project 2061, National Science Education Standards, prior knowledge, curriculum development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
