The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice
Abstract
This study examined the knowledge, beliefs and efforts of five prospective teachers to enact teaching science as inquiry, over the course of a one‐year high school fieldwork experience. Data sources included interviews, field notes, and artifacts, as these prospective teachers engaged in learning how to teach science. Research questions included 1) What were these prospective teachers' beliefs of teaching science? 2) To what extent did these prospective teachers articulate understandings of teaching science as inquiry? 3) In what ways, if any, did these prospective teachers endeavor to teach science as inquiry in their classrooms? 4) In what ways did the mentor teachers' views of teaching science appear to support or constrain these prospective teachers' intentions and abilities to teach science as inquiry? Despite support from a professional development school setting, the Interns' teaching strategies represented an entire spectrum of practice—from traditional, lecture‐driven lessons, to innovative, open, full‐inquiry projects. Evidence suggests one of the critical factors influencing a prospective teacher's intentions and abilities to teach science as inquiry, is the teacher's complex set of personal beliefs about teaching and of science. This paper explores the methodological issues in examining teachers' beliefs and knowledge in actual classroom practice. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 44: 613–642, 2007.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · cited 1×
“In interpreting the views of these five prospective teachers as they enacted teaching as inquiry over the course of a year, it was helpful to use the construct of situated cognition (Brown et al., 1989), in that all knowledge is a product of the situations in which it is produced.”
BackgroundReforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry
Anderson, R. D. (2002) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1015171124982 · Cited by 1,140
Cited by
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012) · APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors. · doi:10.1037/13274-019 · Cited by 991
Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2 · Cited by 342
Self-citationWilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20329 · Cited by 339
Studying science teacher identity: current insights and future research directions
Avraamidou, L. (2014) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.937171 · Cited by 243
Research education of new scientists: Implications for science teacher education
Feldman, A., Divoll, K., & Rogan‐Klyve, A. (2009) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20285 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Crawford, B. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 613-642
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2158234052
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 107.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.