Gender ratios in high school science departments: The effect of percent female faculty on multiple dimensions of students' science identities
Abstract
To examine how school characteristics are tied to science and engineering views and aspirations of students who are underrepresented in science and engineering fields, this mixed‐methods study explores relationships between aspects of students' science identities, and the representation of women among high school science teachers. Quantitative analyses tested the hypothesis that percent female faculty would have a positive effect on girls' science interests, and perceptions in particular, given the potentially greater availability of women role models. Findings indicate that percent female science faculty does not have an effect on a range of science measures for both male and female students, including the ways in which they understand scientific practice, their science self‐concept, and their interest in science‐related college majors. As qualitative data demonstrate, this could reflect practical constraints at schools where female faculty are concentrated and narrow perceptions of science teachers and “real” science. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 44: 980–1009, 2007
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Female science teachers are not considered as expert role models by adolescents because of their perceived lack of real-life science experience, apart from teaching.
“The interviews Gilmartin et al. (2007) performed indicated that female science teachers are not considered as expert role models by adolescents because of their perceived lack of B real-life science experience, ^ apart from teaching.”
From The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Gilmartin et al. 2007
The percentage of female science teachers at a school was not significantly related to adolescents' science engagement and self-understandings.
“For example, in their study, it was found that the percentage of female science teachers at a school was not significantly related to adolescents ' science engagement and self-understandings.”
From The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Gilmartin et al. 2007
Adolescents only position people who are real experts in their eyes as role models.
“However, a mixed-methods study among 1138 American adolescents by Gilmartin et al. (2007) in which perspectives on identity are combined too suggests that adolescents only position people who are real experts in their eyes as role models.”
From The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Gilmartin et al. 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Gilmartin, S., Denson, N., Li, E., Bryant, A., & Aschbacher, P.
- Corresponding author
- Gilmartin, Shannon
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-26
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 980-1009
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2148962635
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- sex ratio, female faculty, science identity, science self-concept, female role models, school characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review