Cited by 41Science Education and PedagogyEducational Technology and E-LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A comparison of student performance following instruction by interactive videodisc versus conventional laboratory

Leonard, William H.·1992·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

This experimental study compared an interactive computer/videodisc learning approach to the conventional laboratory approach for learning biology concepts and science process skills. Students at a large midwestern university were randomly assigned to instruction on respiration and biogeography by interactive videodisc or a traditional laboratory investigation teaching the same concepts. The videodisc delivery system consisted of a TRS‐80 Model III microcomputer interfaced to a Pioneer laser disc player and a color TV monitor. Results show no statistically significant differences between the two approaches for student grades on laboratory quizzes, laboratory reports, and the laboratory final exam. However, the interactive videodisc group required approximately one‐half the classroom time used by the conventional laboratory group. The two approaches appear equivalent when evaluated by traditional learning outcomes, but the interactive videodisc strategy was significantly more time efficient than a traditional laboratory approach.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.3660290109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.2307/4447802 · DOI
  2. Branch C. E., 1987, The validation of interactive videodisc as an alternative to traditional teaching techniques: Auscultation of the heart, Educational Technology, 27, 16
  3. 10.2307/4447801 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/4447816 · DOI
  5. 10.2307/4447803 · DOI
  6. 10.3102/00346543050004525 · DOI
  7. Leonard W. H., 1984, Challenges in the biology laboratory
  8. 10.1002/tea.3660260202 · DOI
  9. Nebraska Videodisc Group, 1983, Climate and life
  10. Nebraska Videodisc Group, 1983, Respiration
  11. Okey J. R.(1985).The effectiveness of computer‐based education: A review. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching French Lick Springs IN.
  12. 10.1002/sce.3730680303 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Leonard, W. H.
Affiliations
Clemson University (US)
Corresponding author
Leonard, William H.
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
93-102
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W1998629830
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
Funders
Annenberg Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
computer-assisted instruction, biology laboratory instruction, science process skills, respiration, biogeography, student performance, laboratory reports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review