The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of student performance following instruction by interactive videodisc versus conventional laboratory
Abstract
This experimental study compared an interactive computer/videodisc learning approach to the conventional laboratory approach for learning biology concepts and science process skills. Students at a large midwestern university were randomly assigned to instruction on respiration and biogeography by interactive videodisc or a traditional laboratory investigation teaching the same concepts. The videodisc delivery system consisted of a TRS‐80 Model III microcomputer interfaced to a Pioneer laser disc player and a color TV monitor. Results show no statistically significant differences between the two approaches for student grades on laboratory quizzes, laboratory reports, and the laboratory final exam. However, the interactive videodisc group required approximately one‐half the classroom time used by the conventional laboratory group. The two approaches appear equivalent when evaluated by traditional learning outcomes, but the interactive videodisc strategy was significantly more time efficient than a traditional laboratory approach.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interactive computer-based learning has equally good efficacy compared to the conventional laboratory approach.
“reporting equally good efficacy of the computer based learning method, compared to the conventional laboratory approach”
Interactive computer-based learning is highly time-efficient.
“highlighting the method as highly time-efficient [23]”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.2307/4447802 · DOI
- Branch C. E., 1987, The validation of interactive videodisc as an alternative to traditional teaching techniques: Auscultation of the heart, Educational Technology, 27, 16
- 10.2307/4447801 · DOI
- 10.2307/4447816 · DOI
- 10.2307/4447803 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543050004525 · DOI
- Leonard W. H., 1984, Challenges in the biology laboratory
- 10.1002/tea.3660260202 · DOI
- Nebraska Videodisc Group, 1983, Climate and life
- Nebraska Videodisc Group, 1983, Respiration
- Okey J. R.(1985).The effectiveness of computer‐based education: A review. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching French Lick Springs IN.
- 10.1002/sce.3730680303 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M. W., & Gadegaard, H. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155895 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Leonard, W. H.
- Affiliations
- Clemson University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leonard, William H.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-102
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W1998629830
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Annenberg Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- computer-assisted instruction, biology laboratory instruction, science process skills, respiration, biogeography, student performance, laboratory reports
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review