The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The two sites of fusion of the neural folds and the two neuropores in the human embryo
Abstract
Background: Since reports on a pattern of multiple sites of fusion of the neural folds in the mouse appeared, it has been widely assumed that a similar pattern must be valid for the human. In the absence of embryological evidence, claims have been made that such a pattern can be discerned by classifying neural tube defects. Methods: The neural folds and tube, as well as the neuropores, were reassessed in 98 human embryos of Stages 8–13; 61 were controlled by precise graphic reconstructions. Results: Careful study of an extensive series of staged human embryos shows that two de novo sites of fusion of the neural folds appear in succession: α in the rhombencephalic region and β in the prosencephalic region, adjacent to the chiasmatic plate. Fusion from Site α proceeds bidirectionally (rostrad and caudad), whereas that from β is unidirectional (caudad only). The fusions terminate in neuropores, of which there are two: rostral and caudal. Highly variable accessory loci of fusion, without positional stability and of unknown frequency, may be encountered in Stage 10 but seemingly not later, and their existence has been known for more than half a century. Conclusions: Two sites of fusion (a term preferred to closure) of the neural folds and two neuropores are found in the human embryo. No convincing embryological evidence of a pattern of multiple sites of fusion, such as has been described in the mouse, is available for the human. The construction of embryological details from information derived from other species or from the examination of later anomalies is liable to error. Neural tube defects are reviewed and although they have been considered on the basis of five, four, or three sites of fusion, interpretations based on two sites can as readily be envisaged. Teratology 65:162–170, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation
Copp, A. J., Greene, N. D. E., & Murdoch, J. N. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1181 · Cited by 697
Greene, N. D. E., & Copp, A. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170354 · Cited by 629
Epidemiologic and genetic aspects of spina bifida and other neural tube defects
Au, K. S., Ashley‐Koch, A., & Northrup, H. (2010) · Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/ddrr.93 · Cited by 344
Neural tube defects—disorders of neurulation and related embryonic processes
Copp, A. J., & Greene, N. D. E. (2013) · WIREs Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.71 · Cited by 268
Robinson, A., Escuin, S., Doudney, K., Vekemans, M., Stevenson, R. E., Greene, N. D. E., Copp, A. J., & Stanier, P. (2012) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.21662 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Rahilly, R., & Müller, F.
- Venue
- Teratology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03-12
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 162-170
- ISSN
- 0040-3709 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9926
- OpenAlex
- W2048446216
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The two sites of fusion of the neural folds and the two neuropores in the human embryo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tera.10007
- The paper
- O'Rahilly, R., & Müller, F. (2002). The two sites of fusion of the neural folds and the two neuropores in the human embryo. Teratology. https://doi.org/10.1002/tera.10007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.