Cited by 151Wound Healing and TreatmentsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsSilk-based biomaterials and applications

Wound-healing effect of electrospun gelatin nanofibres containing Centella asiatica extract in a rat model: Wound healing effect of EGC membrane

Open access
Yao, Chun-Hsu, Yeh, Jen-Yu, Chen, Yueh-Sheng, Li, Ming-Hsien, Huang, Chiung-Hua·2017·Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Abstract

Centella asiatica (CA) is a traditional herbal medicine that has been shown to exert pharmacological effects on wound healing. This study demonstrated that CA extract facilitates the wound-repair process by promoting fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis and exhibits antibacterial activity. Gelatin nanofibres containing C. asiatica extract were fabricated via electrospinning and were shown to exhibit dermal wound-healing activity in a rat model. The wound areas of rat skin treated with electrospun gelatin membranes containing C. asiatica (EGC) presented the highest recovery rate compared with those treated with gauze, neat gelatin membranes and commercial wound dressings. The results of the histopathological examination support the outcome of the wound models. Contact-angle and water-retention measurements confirmed that the addition of C. asiatica extract did not significantly affect the hydrophilicity of the EGC membranes. The measured weight loss revealed that the EGC membranes are biodegradable. The findings suggest that EGC membranes are a promising material for the treatment of skin wounds. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/term.1992

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intensified effect of nanoencapsulated C. asiatica could be observed even when the nano-capsules contained a 30% lower amount of the compound than the control.

    “This intensified effect could be observed even when the nano-capsules contained a 30% lower amount of the compound than the control [52].”

    From A systematic review of the effect of Centella asiatica on wound healing (2022) · cites this paper as [52]

    Section 3.5 reports better wound recovery with Centella asiatica–containing electrospun membranes than with gauze (the control). It does not report nanocapsules or an effect achieved with 30% less compound than the control; the control was gauze, not a formulation containing the compound. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 151

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rieger KA, Birch NP, Schiffman JD. 2013; De- signing electrospun nanofibre mats to pro- mote wound healing -a review. J Mater Chem B 1: 4531-4541

Authors
Yao, C.-H., Yeh, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-S., Li, M.-H., & Huang, C.-H.
Affiliations
  • Asia University (TW)
  • Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • China Medical University (TW)
Corresponding author
Huang, Chiung-Hua
Venue
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Published
2015-02-25
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
905-915
ISSN
1932-6254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105698780
Cited by
151
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Keywords
Centella asiatica, wound healing, electrospinning, fibroblast proliferation, collagen synthesis, antibacterial activity, biodegradable membranes, hydrophilicity, skin wounds
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cell Count, Disease Models, Animal, Fibroblasts, Gelatin, Male, Plant Extracts, Triterpenes, Water, Wound Healing, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Tissue Engineering, Centella, Sus scrofa, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Nanofibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review