Cited by 46Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Decellularized caprine liver extracellular matrix as a 2D substrate coating and 3D hydrogel platform for vascularized liver tissue engineering

Open access
Agarwal, Tarun, Narayan, Rajan, Maji, Somnath, Ghosh, Sudip Kumar, Maiti, Tapas Kumar·2018·Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Abstract

Development of a vascularized liver tissue construct is a need of an hour to circumvent the current demand of liver transplantation in health care sector. An appropriate matrix must support liver cell viability, functionality, and development of microvasculature. With this perspective, here, we report the use of decellularized caprine liver extracellular matrix (CLECM) derived hydrogel for tissue engineering applications. First, CLECM was used as a substrate coating material for 2D hepatocyte culture. HepG2 cells cultured on CLECM-coated surface showed higher albumin, urea, glycogen, and GAGs synthesis in comparison with collagen-coated surface (taken as control for the study). Thereafter, the cells were encapsulated in CLECM hydrogels for 3D culture. In CLECM hydrogels, HepG2 cells showed highly differentiated and polarized phenotype with the appearance of bile canaliculi-like structures and enhanced expression of mature hepatocyte markers. We further showed that CLECM hydrogels also supported the development of microvasculature in vitro, thus making it a suitable candidate for development of a prevascularized liver tissue construct. In conclusion, we proved the superiority of CLECM over collagen for 2D/3D human hepatocyte and endothelial cell culture. CLECM could serve as an efficient biomaterial platform in the development of a liver tissue construct for application in tissue engineering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/term.2594

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agarwal, T., Narayan, R., Maji, S., Ghosh, S. K., & Maiti, T. K.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
Corresponding author
Maiti, Tapas Kumar
Venue
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-23
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
e1678-e1690
ISSN
  • 1932-6254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7005
OpenAlex
W2766217622
Cited by
46
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
goat liver, hydrogels, 3D cell culture, HepG2 cells, hepatocyte differentiation, microcirculation, endothelial cells, liver tissue engineering
MeSH terms
Animals, Extracellular Matrix, Goats, Humans, Liver, Male, Solubility, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Hydrogels, Hepatocytes, Tissue Engineering, Hep G2 Cells, Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review