Cited by 137Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsWound Healing and Treatments

Vascularization strategies in tissue engineering approaches for soft tissue repair

Open access
Masson‐Meyers, Daniela Santos, Tayebi, Lobat·2021·Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Abstract

Insufficient vascularization during tissue repair is often associated with poor clinical outcomes. This is a concern especially when patients have critical-sized injuries, where the size of the defect restricts vascularity, or even in small defects that have to be treated under special conditions, such as after radiation therapy (relevant to tumor resection) that hinders vascularity. In fact, poor vascularization is one of the major obstacles for clinical application of tissue engineering methods in soft tissue repair. As a key issue, lack of graft integration, caused by inadequate vascularization after implantation, can lead to graft failure. Moreover, poor vascularization compromises the viability of cells seeded in deep portions of scaffolds/graft materials, due to hypoxia and insufficient nutrient supply. In this article we aim to review vascularization strategies employed in tissue engineering techniques to repair soft tissues. For this purpose, we start by providing a brief overview of the main events during the physiological wound healing process in soft tissues. Then, we discuss how tissue repair can be achieved through tissue engineering, and considerations with regards to the choice of scaffold materials, culture conditions, and vascularization techniques. Next, we highlight the importance of vascularization, along with strategies and methods of prevascularization of soft tissue equivalents, particularly cell-based prevascularization. Lastly, we present a summary of commonly used in vitro methods during the vascularization of tissue-engineered soft tissue constructs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/term.3225

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. Aghaloo TL, & Hadaya D (2017). Basic Principles of Bioengineering and Regeneration. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 29(1), 1– 7. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2016.08.008 27890223 PMC5540321 · DOI
  2. Almela T, Brook IM, & Moharamzadeh K (2016). Development of three-dimensional tissue engineered bone-oral mucosal composite models. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 27(4), 65. doi: 10.1007/s10856-016-5676-7 26883949 PMC4756037 · DOI
  3. Andrée B, Ichanti H, Kalies S, Heisterkamp A, Strauß S, Vogt P-M, … Hilfiker A (2019). Formation of three-dimensional tubular endothelial cell networks under defined serum-free cell culture conditions in human collagen hydrogels. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 5437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41985-6 30932006 PMC6443732 · DOI
  4. Auger FA, Gibot L, & Lacroix D (2013). The pivotal role of vascularization in tissue engineering. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 15, 177– 200. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152428 23642245 · DOI
  5. Baiguera S, & Ribatti D (2013). Endothelialization approaches for viable engineered tissues. Angiogenesis, 16(1), 1– 14. doi: 10.1007/s10456-012-9307-8 23010872 · DOI
  6. Baldwin J, Antille M, Bonda U, De-Juan-Pardo EM, Khosrotehrani K, Ivanovski S, … Hutmacher DW (2014). In vitro pre-vascularisation of tissue-engineered constructs A co-culture perspective. Vasc Cell, 6, 13. doi: 10.1186/2045-824x-6-13 25071932 PMC4112973 · DOI
  7. Blatt S, Burkhardt V, Kämmerer PW, Pabst AM, Sagheb K, Heller M, … Schiegnitz E (2020). Biofunctionalization of porcine-derived collagen matrices with platelet rich fibrin: influence on angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Clin Oral Investig. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03213-8 32030513 · DOI
  8. Boccardo S, Gaudiello E, Melly L, Cerino G, Ricci D, Martin I, … Marsano A (2016). Engineered mesenchymal cell-based patches as controlled VEGF delivery systems to induce extrinsic angiogenesis. Acta Biomater, 42, 127– 135. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.041 27469308 · DOI
  9. Chan EC, Kuo S-M, Kong AM, Morrison WA, Dusting GJ, Mitchell GM, … Liu G-S (2016). Three Dimensional Collagen Scaffold Promotes Intrinsic Vascularisation for Tissue Engineering Applications. PLoS One, 11(2), e0149799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149799 26900837 PMC4762944 · DOI
  10. Chandra P, & Atala A (2019). Engineering blood vessels and vascularized tissues: technology trends and potential clinical applications. Clin Sci (Lond), 133(9), 1115– 1135. doi: 10.1042/cs20180155 31088895 · DOI
  11. Chen L, Xing Q, Zhai Q, Tahtinen M, Zhou F, Chen L, … Zhao F (2017). Pre-vascularization Enhances Therapeutic Effects of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sheets in Full Thickness Skin Wound Repair. Theranostics, 7(1), 117– 131. doi: 10.7150/thno.17031 28042321 PMC5196890 · DOI
  12. Cheung JW, Jain D, McCulloch CA, & Santerre JP (2015). Pro-angiogenic character of endothelial cells and gingival fibroblasts cocultures in perfused degradable polyurethane scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A, 21(9–10), 1587– 1599. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0548 25631100 · DOI
  13. Costa-Almeida R, Gomez-Lazaro M, Ramalho C, Granja PL, Soares R, & Guerreiro SG (2015). Fibroblast-endothelial partners for vascularization strategies in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, 21(5–6), 1055– 1065. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0443 25340984 PMC4356233 · DOI
  14. Costa-Almeida R, Granja PL, Soares R, & Guerreiro SG (2014). Cellular strategies to promote vascularisation in tissue engineering applications. Eur Cell Mater, 28, 51– 66; discussion 66–57. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v028a05 25050838 · DOI
  15. Costa-Almeida R, Soares R, & Granja PL (2017). Fibroblasts as maestros orchestrating tissue regeneration. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 12(1), 240– 251. doi: 10.1002/term.2405 28109062 · DOI
  16. Datta P, Ayan B, & Ozbolat IT (2017). Bioprinting for vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication. Acta Biomater, 51, 1– 20. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.035 28087487 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Deb S, Mandegaran R, & Di Silvio L (2010). A porous scaffold for bone tissue engineering/45S5 Bioglass derived porous scaffolds for co-culturing osteoblasts and endothelial cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 21(3), 893– 905. doi: 10.1007/s10856-009-3936-5 20091103 · DOI
  18. DeCicco-Skinner KL, Henry GH, Cataisson C, Tabib T, Gwilliam JC, Watson NJ, … Wiest JS (2014). Endothelial cell tube formation assay for the in vitro study of angiogenesis. J Vis Exp(91), e51312. doi: 10.3791/51312 25225985 PMC4540586 · DOI
  19. dela Paz NG, & D’Amore PA (2009). Arterial versus venous endothelial cells. Cell and Tissue Research, 335(1), 5– 16. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0706-5 18972135 PMC4105978 · DOI
  20. Dos Santos BP, Garbay B, Fenelon M, Rosselin M, Garanger E, Lecommandoux S, … Amédée J (2019). Development of a cell-free and growth factor-free hydrogel capable of inducing angiogenesis and innervation after subcutaneous implantation. Acta Biomater, 99, 154– 167. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.028 31425892 · DOI
  21. Dzobo K, Thomford NE, Senthebane DA, Shipanga H, Rowe A, Dandara C, … Motaung K (2018). Advances in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: Innovation and Transformation of Medicine. Stem Cells Int, 2018, 2495848. doi: 10.1155/2018/2495848 30154861 PMC6091336 · DOI
  22. Foster DS, Jones RE, Ransom RC, Longaker MT, & Norton JA (2018). The evolving relationship of wound healing and tumor stroma. JCI Insight, 3(18). doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.99911 PMC6237224 30232274 · DOI
  23. Gaudiello E, Melly L, Cerino G, Boccardo S, Jalili-Firoozinezhad S, Xu L, … Marsano A (2017). Scaffold Composition Determines the Angiogenic Outcome of Cell-Based Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression by Modulating Its Microenvironmental Distribution. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 6(24), 1700600. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700600 28994225 · DOI
  24. Gonzalez AC, Costa TF, Andrade ZA, & Medrado AR (2016). Wound healing - A literature review. An Bras Dermatol, 91(5), 614– 620. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164741 27828635 PMC5087220 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gouin J-P, & Kiecolt-Glaser JK (2011). The impact of psychological stress on wound healing: methods and mechanisms. Immunology and allergy clinics of North America, 31(1), 81– 93. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2010.09.010 21094925 PMC3052954 · DOI
  26. Guerreiro SG, Brochhausen C, Negrão R, Barbosa MA, Unger RE, Kirkpatrick CJ, … Granja PL (2012). Implanted neonatal human dermal fibroblasts influence the recruitment of endothelial cells in mice. Biomatter, 2(1), 43– 52. doi: 10.4161/biom.20063 23507785 PMC3849057 · DOI
  27. Guerreiro SG, Oliveira MJ, Barbosa MA, Soares R, & Granja PL (2014). Neonatal human dermal fibroblasts immobilized in RGD-alginate induce angiogenesis. Cell Transplant, 23(8), 945– 957. doi: 10.3727/096368913×670183 23866308 · DOI
  28. Guerreiro SG, Unger RE, Cerqueira NMFSA, Sartoris A, Martins MJ, Barbosa MA, … Kirkpatrick CJ (2020). Alkaline phosphatase dual-binding sites for collagen dictate cell migration and microvessel assembly in vitro. Journal of cellular biochemistry, 122(1), 116– 129. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29835 32748513 · DOI
  29. Haro Durand LA, Vargas GE, Vera-Mesones R, Baldi A, Zago MP, Fanovich MA, … Gorustovich A (2017). In Vitro Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells Response to Ionic Dissolution Products from Lithium-Containing 45S5 Bioactive Glass. Materials (Basel), 10(7). doi: 10.3390/ma10070740 PMC5551783 28773103 · DOI
  30. Heller M, Bauer HK, Schwab R, Blatt S, Peters K, Nezi-Cahn S, … Brenner W (2020). The impact of intercellular communication for the generation of complex multicellular prevascularized tissue equivalents. J Biomed Mater Res A, 108(3), 734– 748. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36853 31788941 · DOI
  31. Heller M, Frerick-Ochs EV, Bauer HK, Schiegnitz E, Flesch D, Brieger J, … Brenner W (2016). Tissue engineered pre-vascularized buccal mucosa equivalents utilizing a primary triculture of epithelial cells, endothelial cells and fibroblasts. Biomaterials, 77, 207– 215. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.073 26606446 · DOI
  32. Herrmann M, Binder A, Menzel U, Zeiter S, Alini M, & Verrier S (2014). CD34/CD133 enriched bone marrow progenitor cells promote neovascularization of tissue engineered constructs in vivo. Stem Cell Research, 13(3, Part A), 465– 477. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2014.10.005 25460607 · DOI
  33. Irvin MW, Zijlstra A, Wikswo JP, & Pozzi A (2014). Techniques and assays for the study of angiogenesis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 239(11), 1476– 1488. doi: 10.1177/1535370214529386 24872440 PMC4216737 · DOI
  34. Karppinen S, Heljasvaara R, Gullberg D, Tasanen K, & Pihlajaniemi T (2019). Toward understanding scarless skin wound healing and pathological scarring [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 8(787). doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18293.1 PMC6556993 31231509 · DOI
  35. Khmaladze A, Ganguly A, Kuo S, Raghavan M, Kainkaryam R, Cole JH, … Morris MD (2013). Tissue-engineered constructs of human oral mucosa examined by Raman spectroscopy. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 19(4), 299– 306. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0287 22992065 PMC3583251 · DOI
  36. Kirkpatrick CJ, Fuchs S, & Unger RE (2011). Co-culture systems for vascularization--learning from nature. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 63(4–5), 291– 299. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.01.009 21281686 · DOI
  37. Kniebs C, Kreimendahl F, Köpf M, Fischer H, Jockenhoevel S, & Thiebes AL (2020). Influence of Different Cell Types and Sources on Pre-Vascularisation in Fibrin and Agarose-Collagen Gels. Organogenesis, 16(1), 14– 26. doi: 10.1080/15476278.2019.1697597 31809643 PMC7051161 · DOI
  38. Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, & Lewis JA (2016). Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(12), 3179– 3184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521342113 PMC4812707 26951646 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Kreimendahl F, Köpf M, Thiebes AL, Duarte Campos DF, Blaeser A, Schmitz-Rode T, … Fischer H (2017). Three-Dimensional Printing and Angiogenesis: Tailored Agarose-Type I Collagen Blends Comprise Three-Dimensional Printability and Angiogenesis Potential for Tissue-Engineered Substitutes. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 23(10), 604– 615. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0234 28826357 · DOI
  40. Lang I, Pabst MA, Hiden U, Blaschitz A, Dohr G, Hahn T, & Desoye G (2003). Heterogeneity of microvascular endothelial cells isolated from human term placenta and macrovascular umbilical vein endothelial cells. European Journal of Cell Biology, 82(4), 163– 173. doi: 10.1078/0171-9335-00306 12751902 · DOI
  41. Larsson L, Decker AM, Nibali L, Pilipchuk SP, Berglundh T, & Giannobile WV (2016). Regenerative Medicine for Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases. J Dent Res, 95(3), 255– 266. doi: 10.1177/0022034515618887 26608580 PMC4766955 · DOI
  42. Lee J, Kim EH, Shin D, & Roh JL (2017). Accelerated oral wound healing using a pre-vascularized mucosal cell sheet. Sci Rep, 7(1), 10667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10991-x 28878261 PMC5587673 · DOI
  43. Lee J, Shin D, & Roh JL (2018). Use of a pre-vascularised oral mucosal cell sheet for promoting cutaneous burn wound healing. Theranostics, 8(20), 5703– 5712. doi: 10.7150/thno.28754 30555575 PMC6276302 · DOI
  44. Liew AWL, Zhang, & Yilei. (2017). In vitro pre-vascularization strategies for tissue engineered constructs-Bioprinting and others. International Journal of Bioprinting, 3(1), 008– 008. doi: 10.18063/IIB.2017.01.008 PMC7575626 33094183 · DOI
  45. Liu WC, Chen S, Zheng L, & Qin L (2017). Angiogenesis Assays for the Evaluation of Angiogenic Properties of Orthopaedic Biomaterials - A General Review. Adv Healthc Mater, 6(5). doi: 10.1002/adhm.201600434 28135051 · DOI
  46. Liu X, Chen W, Zhang C, Thein-Han W, Hu K, Reynolds MA, … Xu HHK (2017). Co-Seeding Human Endothelial Cells with Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Calcium Phosphate Scaffold Enhances Osteogenesis and Vascularization in Rats. Tissue Eng Part A, 23(11–12), 546– 555. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0485 28287922 PMC5911709 · DOI
  47. Liu Y, Chan JK, & Teoh SH (2012). Review of vascularised bone tissue-engineering strategies with a focus on co-culture systems. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 9(2), 85– 105. doi: 10.1002/term.1617 23166000 · DOI
  48. Lu J, Guan F, Cui F, Sun X, Zhao L, Wang Y, & Wang X (2019). Enhanced angiogenesis by the hyaluronic acid hydrogels immobilized with a VEGF mimetic peptide in a traumatic brain injury model in rats. Regenerative Biomaterials, 6(6), 325– 334. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbz027 31827886 PMC6897340 · DOI
  49. Masson-Meyers DS, Andrade TAM, Caetano GF, Guimaraes FR, Leite MN, Leite SN, & Frade MAC (2020). Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment. International Journal of Experimental Pathology, 101(1–2), 21– 37. doi: 10.1111/iep.12346 32227524 PMC7306904 · DOI
  50. Mastrullo V, Cathery W, Velliou E, Madeddu P, & Campagnolo P (2020). Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: As Nature Intended? Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8(188). doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00188 PMC7099606 32266227 · DOI
  51. Min S, Ko IK, & Yoo JJ (2019). State-of-the-Art Strategies for the Vascularization of Three-Dimensional Engineered Organs. Vasc Specialist Int, 35(2), 77– 89. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2019.35.2.77 31297357 PMC6609020 · DOI
  52. Minor AJ, & Coulombe KLK (2020). Engineering a collagen matrix for cell-instructive regenerative angiogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 108(6), 2407– 2416. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34573 31984665 PMC7334070 · DOI
  53. Morin KT, & Tranquillo RT (2013). In vitro models of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in fibrin gel. Exp Cell Res, 319(16), 2409– 2417. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.06.006 23800466 PMC3919069 · DOI
  54. Nguyen LH, Annabi N, Nikkhah M, Bae H, Binan L, Park S, … Khademhosseini A (2012). Vascularized bone tissue engineering: approaches for potential improvement. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 18(5), 363– 382. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0012 22765012 PMC3458624 · DOI
  55. Nishiyama K, Akagi T, Iwai S, & Akashi M (2019). Construction of Vascularized Oral Mucosa Equivalents Using a Layer-by-Layer Cell Coating Technology. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 25(5), 262– 275. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2018.0337 30838934 · DOI
  56. Novosel EC, Kleinhans C, & Kluger PJ (2011). Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 63(4–5), 300– 311. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.004 21396416 · DOI
  57. Omidi M, Almeida L, & Tayebi L (2020). Microfluidic-assisted fabrication of reverse micelle/PLGA hybrid microspheres for sustained vascular endothelial growth factor delivery. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. doi: 10.1002/bab.1971 32533571 · DOI
  58. Oryan A, & Sahvieh S (2017). Effectiveness of chitosan scaffold in skin, bone and cartilage healing. Int J Biol Macromol, 104(Pt A), 1003– 1011. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.124 28684351 · DOI
  59. Park KM, & Gerecht S (2014). Hypoxia-inducible hydrogels. Nat Commun, 5, 4075. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5075 24909742 PMC4161608 · DOI
  60. Perez-Amodio S, Tra WM, Rakhorst HA, Hovius SE, & van Neck JW (2011). Hypoxia preconditioning of tissue-engineered mucosa enhances its angiogenic capacity in vitro. Tissue Eng Part A, 17(11–12), 1583– 1593. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0429 21303226 · DOI
  61. Politis C, Schoenaers J, Jacobs R, & Agbaje JO (2016). Wound Healing Problems in the Mouth. Frontiers in Physiology, 7(507). doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00507 PMC5089986 27853435 · DOI
  62. Rademakers T, Horvath JM, van Blitterswijk CA, & LaPointe VLS (2019). Oxygen and nutrient delivery in tissue engineering: Approaches to graft vascularization. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 13(10), 1815– 1829. doi: 10.1002/term.2932 31310055 PMC6852121 · DOI
  63. Ren L, Ma D, Liu B, Li J, Chen J, Yang D, & Gao P (2014). Preparation of three-dimensional vascularized MSC cell sheet constructs for tissue regeneration. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 301279. doi: 10.1155/2014/301279 25110670 PMC4119697 · DOI
  64. Rieger S, Zhao H, Martin P, Abe K, & Lisse TS (2015). The role of nuclear hormone receptors in cutaneous wound repair. Cell Biochem Funct, 33(1), 1– 13. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3086 25529612 PMC4357276 · DOI
  65. Rizwan M, Yahya R, Hassan A, Yar M, Abd Halim AA, Rageh Al-Maleki A, … Zubairi W (2019). Novel chitosan derivative based composite scaffolds with enhanced angiogenesis; potential candidates for healing chronic non-healing wounds. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 30(6), 72. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6273-3 31187295 · DOI
  66. Rouwkema J, & Khademhosseini A (2016). Vascularization and Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: Beyond Creating Static Networks. Trends Biotechnol, 34(9), 733– 745. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.002 27032730 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Saberianpour S, Heidarzadeh M, Geranmayeh MH, Hosseinkhani H, Rahbarghazi R, & Nouri M (2018). Tissue engineering strategies for the induction of angiogenesis using biomaterials. J Biol Eng, 12, 36. doi: 10.1186/s13036-018-0133-4 30603044 PMC6307144 · DOI
  68. Sacchi V, Mittermayr R, Hartinger J, Martino MM, Lorentz KM, Wolbank S, … Banfi A (2014). Long-lasting fibrin matrices ensure stable and functional angiogenesis by highly tunable, sustained delivery of recombinant VEGF164. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(19), 6952– 6957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404605111 PMC4024904 24778233 · DOI
  69. Samal J, Weinandy S, Weinandy A, Helmedag M, Rongen L, Hermanns-Sachweh B, … Jockenhoevel S (2015). Co-Culture of Human Endothelial Cells and Foreskin Fibroblasts on 3D Silk-Fibrin Scaffolds Supports Vascularization. Macromol Biosci, 15(10), 1433– 1446. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201500054 26097223 · DOI
  70. Sarker M, Chen XB, & Schreyer DJ (2015). Experimental approaches to vascularisation within tissue engineering constructs. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 26(12), 683– 734. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2015.1059018 26053971 · DOI
  71. Sculean A, Gruber R, & Bosshardt DD (2014). Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J Clin Periodontol, 41 Suppl 15, S6– 22. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12206 24641001 · DOI
  72. Shah R, Domah F, Shah N, & Domah J (2020). Surgical Wound Healing in the Oral Cavity: a Review. Dental Update, 47(2), 135– 143. doi: 10.12968/denu.2020.47.2.135 · DOI
  73. Sharma D, Ross D, Wang G, Jia W, Kirkpatrick SJ, & Zhao F (2019). Upgrading prevascularization in tissue engineering: A review of strategies for promoting highly organized microvascular network formation. Acta Biomater, 95, 112– 130. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.016 30878450 · DOI
  74. Shen C, Li Y, Wang H, & Meng Q (2017). Mechanically strong interpenetrating network hydrogels for differential cellular adhesion. RSC Advances, 7(29), 18046– 18053. doi: 10.1039/C7RA01271C · DOI
  75. Shi B, Andrukhov O, Berner S, Schedle A, & Rausch-Fan X (2014). The angiogenic behaviors of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in co-culture with osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on different titanium surfaces. Dent Mater, 30(8), 839– 847. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.005 24934511 · DOI
  76. Simons M, Alitalo K, Annex BH, Augustin HG, Beam C, Berk BC, … Dimmeler S (2015). State-of-the-Art Methods for Evaluation of Angiogenesis and Tissue Vascularization: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Res, 116(11), e99– 132. doi: 10.1161/res.0000000000000054 25931450 PMC8077227 · DOI
  77. Suzuki A, Kato H, Kawakami T, Kodama Y, Shiozawa M, Kuwae H, … Izumi K (2020). Development of microstructured fish scale collagen scaffolds to manufacture a tissue-engineered oral mucosa equivalent. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 31(5), 578– 600. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2019.1706147 31928320 · DOI
  78. Takei T, Sakai S, & Yoshida M (2016). In vitro formation of vascular-like networks using hydrogels. J Biosci Bioeng, 122(5), 519– 527. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.03.023 27117917 · DOI
  79. Tien J (2019). Tissue Engineering of the Microvasculature. Compr Physiol, 9(3), 1155– 1212. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c180037 31187896 PMC7025285 · DOI
  80. Tomasina C, Bodet T, Mota C, Moroni L, & Camarero-Espinosa S (2019). Bioprinting Vasculature: Materials, Cells and Emergent Techniques. Materials (Basel), 12(17). doi: 10.3390/ma12172701 PMC6747573 31450791 · DOI
  81. Torres AL, Bidarra SJ, Pinto MT, Aguiar PC, Silva EA, & Barrias CC (2018). Guiding morphogenesis in cell-instructive microgels for therapeutic angiogenesis. Biomaterials, 154, 34– 47. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.051 29120817 · DOI
  82. Torres AL, Bidarra SJ, Vasconcelos DP, Barbosa JN, Silva EA, Nascimento DS, & Barrias CC (2020). Microvascular engineering: Dynamic changes in microgel-entrapped vascular cells correlates with higher vasculogenic/angiogenic potential. Biomaterials, 228, 119554. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119554 31677395 · DOI
  83. Um Min Allah N, Berahim Z, Ahmad A, & Kannan TP (2017). Biological Interaction Between Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Vascular Endothelial Cells for Angiogenesis: A Co-culture Perspective. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 14(5), 495– 505. doi: 10.1007/s13770-017-0065-y 30603504 PMC6171632 · DOI
  84. Unterleuthner D, Kramer N, Pudelko K, Burian A, Hengstschläger M, & Dolznig H (2017). An Optimized 3D Coculture Assay for Preclinical Testing of Pro- and Antiangiogenic Drugs. SLAS Discov, 22(5), 602– 613. doi: 10.1177/2472555216686529 28346097 · DOI
  85. Wan X, Bovornchutichai P, Cui Z, O’Neill E, & Ye H (2017). Morphological analysis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells co-cultured with ovarian cancer cells in 3D: An oncogenic angiogenesis assay. PLoS One, 12(7), e0180296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180296 28671994 PMC5495474 · DOI
  86. Wang J, & Xu J (2020). Effects of Topical Insulin on Wound Healing: A Review of Animal and Human Evidences. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 13, 719– 727. doi: 10.2147/dmso.S237294 32214835 PMC7078652 · DOI
  87. Weigand A, Beier JP, Arkudas A, Al-Abboodi M, Polykandriotis E, Horch RE, & Boos AM (2016). The Arteriovenous (AV) Loop in a Small Animal Model to Study Angiogenesis and Vascularized Tissue Engineering. J Vis Exp(117). doi: 10.3791/54676 PMC5226146 27842348 · DOI
  88. Weinandy S, Laffar S, Unger RE, Flanagan TC, Loesel R, Kirkpatrick CJ, … Jockenhoevel S (2014). Biofunctionalized microfiber-assisted formation of intrinsic three-dimensional capillary-like structures. Tissue Eng Part A, 20(13–14), 1858– 1869. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0330 24456033 PMC4086673 · DOI
  89. Wong HK, Ivan Lam CR, Wen F, Mark Chong SK, Tan NS, Jerry C, … Tan LP (2016). Novel method to improve vascularization of tissue engineered constructs with biodegradable fibers. Biofabrication, 8(1), 015004. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015004 26741237 · DOI
  90. Xiao X, Wang W, Liu D, Zhang H, Gao P, Geng L, … Wang Z (2015). The promotion of angiogenesis induced by three-dimensional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold with different interconnection sizes via activation of PI3K/Akt pathways. Sci Rep, 5, 9409. doi: 10.1038/srep09409 25797242 PMC4369742 · DOI
  91. Xie R, Zheng W, Guan L, Ai Y, & Liang Q (2020). Engineering of Hydrogel Materials with Perfusable Microchannels for Building Vascularized Tissues. Small, 16(15), e1902838. doi: 10.1002/smll.201902838 31559675 · DOI
  92. Yang G, Mahadik B, Choi JY, & Fisher JP (2020). Vascularization in tissue engineering: fundamentals and state-of-art. Progress in Biomedical Engineering, 2(1), 012002. doi: 10.1088/2516-1091/ab5637 34308105 PMC8302186 · DOI
  93. Zhang B, Yang S, Zhang Y, Sun Z, Xu W, & Ye S (2012). Co-culture of mesenchymal stem cells with umbilical vein endothelial cells under hypoxic condition. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 32(2), 173– 180. doi: 10.1007/s11596-012-0031-9 22528216 · DOI
  94. Zucchelli E, Majid QA, & Foldes G (2019). New artery of knowledge: 3D models of angiogenesis. Vasc Biol, 1(1), H135– h143. doi: 10.1530/vb-19-0026 32923965 PMC7439835 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masson‐Meyers, D. S., & Tayebi, L.
Affiliations
Marquette University (US)
Corresponding author
Tayebi, Lobat
Venue
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-31
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
747-762
ISSN
  • 1932-6254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7005
OpenAlex
W3165520063
Cited by
137
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
vascularization, soft tissue repair, tissue engineering, wound healing, graft integration, graft failure, hypoxia, scaffold materials, critical-size bone defect, radiotherapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Humans, Regeneration, Wound Healing, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Tissue Engineering, Regenerative Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review