Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inhibition of sulfate‐reducing bacteria by metal sulfide formation in bioremediation of acid mine drainage

Utgikar, Vivek P., Harmon, Stephen M., Chaudhary, Navendu, Tabak, Henry H., Govind, Rakesh, Haines, John R.·2002·Environmental Toxicology

Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD) containing high concentrations of sulfate and heavy metal ions can be treated by biological sulfate reduction. It has been reported that the effect of heavy metals on sulfate‐reducing bacteria (SRB) can be stimulatory at lower concentrations and toxic/inhibitory at higher concentrations. The quantification of the toxic/inhibitory effect of dissolved heavy metals is critical for the design and operation of an effective AMD bioremediation process. Serum bottle and batch reactor studies on metal toxicity to SRB indicate that insoluble metal sulfides can inhibit the SRB activity as well. The mechanism of inhibition is postulated to be external to the bacterial cell. The experimental data indicate that the metal sulfides formed due to the reaction between the dissolved metal and biogenic sulfide act as barriers preventing the access of the reactants (sulfate, organic matter) to the necessary enzymes. Scanning electron micrographs of the SRB cultures exposed to copper and zinc provide supporting evidence for this hypothesis. The SRB cultures retained their ability to effect sulfate reduction indicating that the metal sulfides were not lethally toxic to the SRB. This phenomenon of metal sulfide inhibition of the SRB has to be taken into account while designing a sulfate‐reducing bioreator, and subsequently an efficient biotreatment strategy for AMD. Any metal sulfide formed in the bioreactor needs to be removed immediately from the system to maintain the efficiency of the process of sulfate reduction. © 2002 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 17: 40–48, 2002

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tox.10031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. American Public Health Association (APHA), 1998, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater
  2. Atlas RM., 1993, Handbook of microbiological media
  3. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1582-5 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/199622a0 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0883-2927(89)90056-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/02772249409358113 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hayat MA., 1989, Biological applications
  8. Hines ME, 1982, Appl Environ Microbiol, 44, 502, 10.1128/aem.44.2.502-505.1982 · DOI
  9. Isa Z, 1986, Appl Environ Microbiol, 51, 572, 10.1128/aem.51.3.572-579.1986 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0167-7012(94)00061-B · DOI
  11. 10.1023/A:1008339018423 · DOI
  12. Klee AJ., 1996, Most probable number calculator, version 4.04
  13. 10.1016/0269-7491(90)90072-K · DOI
  14. 10.1002/tox.2530070405 · DOI
  15. Miller LP., 1950, Contr Boyce Thompson Inst, 16, 73
  16. Miller LP., 1950, Contr Boyce Thompson Inst, 16, 85
  17. Millonig G., 1996, Laboratory manual of biological electron microscopy
  18. Mosey FE, 1975, Water Pollut Cont, 74, 18
  19. 10.1002/bit.260391007 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/01490459709378032 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/bit.260400506 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1964.tb04914.x · DOI
  23. 10.2113/gsecongeo.59.2.271 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00053-6 · DOI
  25. Utgikar VP, 2001, Environ Toxicol Chem
  26. Wildeman T, 1991, Draft handbook for constructed wetlands receiving acid mine drainage

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Utgikar, V. P., Harmon, S. M., Chaudhary, N., Tabak, H. H., Govind, R., & Haines, J. R.
Venue
Environmental Toxicology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
40-48
ISSN
  • 1520-4081
  • 1522-7278
Cited by
198
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of sulfate‐reducing bacteria by metal sulfide formation in bioremediation of acid mine drainage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tox.10031
The paper
Utgikar, V. P., Harmon, S. M., Chaudhary, N., Tabak, H. H., Govind, R., & Haines, J. R. (2002). Inhibition of sulfate‐reducing bacteria by metal sulfide formation in bioremediation of acid mine drainage. Environmental Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.10031