The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Fe and Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and differences in bioavailability during exposure in aqueous suspension and soil
Abstract
The potential environmental toxicity of zero‐valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI) and three types of nanosilver differing in average particle size from 1 to 20 nm was evaluated using seed germination tests with ryegrass, barley, and flax exposed to 0–5000 mg L−1 nZVI or 0–100 mg L−1 Ag. For nZVI, germination tests were conducted both in water and in two contrasting soils to test the impact of assumed differences in bioavailability of nanoparticles. Inhibitory effects were observed in aqueous suspensions at 250 mg L−1 for nZVI and 10 mg L−1 for Ag. Reduction in shoot growth was a more sensitive endpoint than germination percentage. Complete inhibition of germination was observed at 1000–2000 mg L−1 for nZVI. For Ag, complete inhibition was not achieved. The presence of soil had a modest influence on toxicity, and inhibitory effects were observed at 300 mg nZVI L−1 water in soil (equivalent to 1000 mg nZVI kg−1 soil). Complete inhibition was observed at 750 and 1500 mg L−1 in sandy soil for flax and ryegrass, respectively, while for barley 13% germination still occurred at 1500 mg L−1. In clay soil, inhibition was less pronounced. Our results indicate that nZVI at low concentrations can be used without detrimental effects on plants and thus be suitable for combined remediation where plants are involved. Silver nanoparticles inhibited seed germination at lower concentrations, but showed no clear size‐dependant effects, and never completely impeded germination. Thus, seed germination tests seem less suited for estimation of environmental impact of Ag. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 2012.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview
Zhang, W.-X. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025520116015 · Cited by 2,003
Cited by
Review on nano zerovalent iron (nZVI): From synthesis to environmental applications
Stefaniuk, M., Oleszczuk, P., & Ok, Y. S. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.046 · Cited by 935
Tripathi, D. K., Shweta, Singh, S., Singh, S., Pandey, R., Singh, V. P., Sharma, N. C., Prasad, S. M., Dubey, N. K., & Chauhan, D. K. (2017) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.07.030 · Cited by 935
Magnetic nanoparticles: Essential factors for sustainable environmental applications
Tang, S. C. N., & Lo, I. M. C. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.039 · Cited by 891
A review of the use of engineered nanomaterials to suppress plant disease and enhance crop yield
Servin, A., Elmer, W., Mukherjee, A., De la Torre-Roche, R., Hamdi, H., White, J. C., Bindraban, P., & Dimkpa, C. (2015) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-015-2907-7 · Cited by 731
Nanotechnologies in Food Science: Applications, Recent Trends, and Future Perspectives
Nile, S. H., Baskar, V., Selvaraj, D., Nile, A., Xiao, J., & Kai, G. (2020) · Nano-Micro Letters · doi:10.1007/s40820-020-0383-9 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- El‐Temsah, Y. S., & Joner, E. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-16
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-49
- ISSN
- 1520-4081 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-7278
- OpenAlex
- W2057042088
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Fe and Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and differences in bioavailability during exposure in aqueous suspension and soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tox.20610
- The paper
- El‐Temsah, Y. S., & Joner, E. J. (2012). Impact of Fe and Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and differences in bioavailability during exposure in aqueous suspension and soil. Environmental Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20610
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.