Cited by 49Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchImmunotoxicology and immune responsesToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Subchronic Effects of Perfluorooctanesulfonate Exposure on Inflammation in Adult Male C57BL/6 Mice

Dong, Guang‐Hui, Zhang, Ying‐Hua, Zheng, Li, Liang, Zai‐Fu, Jin, Yi‐He, He, Qin‐Cheng·2012·Environmental Toxicology

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that exposure to perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), a ubiquitous and highly persistent environmental contaminant, induces immunotoxicity in mice. However, few studies have specifically assessed the effects of PFOS on inflammation. This study utilized a standard 60-day oral exposure period to assess the effects of PFOS on the response of inflammatory cytokines [tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-1 β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6)]. Adult male C57BL/6 mice were dosed daily by oral gavage with PFOS at 0, 0.0083, 0.0167, 0.0833, 0.4167, 0.8333 or 2.0833 mg/kg/day to yield a targeted Total Administered Dose (TAD) over 60 days of 0, 0.5, 1, 5, 25, 50, or 125 mg PFOS/kg, respectively. The percentage of peritoneal macrophages (CD11b+ cells) was significantly increased at concentrations ≥ 1 mg PFOS/kg TAD in a dose-dependent manner. Ex vivo IL-1β production by peritoneal macrophages was elevated substantially at concentrations of ≥ 5 mg PFOS/kg TAD. Moreover, PFOS exposure markedly enhanced the ex vivo production of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 by peritoneal and splenic macrophages when stimulated either in vitro or in vivo with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The serum levels of these inflammatory cytokines observed in response to in vivo stimulation with LPS were elevated substantially by exposure to PFOS. PFOS exposure elevated the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and proto-oncogene, c-myc, in the spleen. These data suggest that exposure to PFOS modulates the inflammatory response, and further research is needed to determine the mechanism of action.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tox.20642

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 49

Authors
Dong, G., Zhang, Y., Zheng, L., Liang, Z., Jin, Y., & He, Q.
Affiliations
China Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Dong, Guang‐Hui
Venue
Environmental Toxicology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-24
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
285-296
ISSN
  • 1520-4081 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-7278
OpenAlex
W2012086752
Cited by
49
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
PFOS, immunotoxicity, inflammation, inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α, IL-1β, interleukin-6, peritoneal macrophages, lipopolysaccharide stimulation, c-Myc, perfluorinated compounds, oral exposure
MeSH terms
Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fluorocarbons, Inflammation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Spleen, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Interleukin-6, Cytokines, Macrophages, Peritoneal, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Mice, Interleukin-1beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review