Subchronic Effects of Perfluorooctanesulfonate Exposure on Inflammation in Adult Male C57BL/6 Mice
Abstract
Previous studies indicate that exposure to perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), a ubiquitous and highly persistent environmental contaminant, induces immunotoxicity in mice. However, few studies have specifically assessed the effects of PFOS on inflammation. This study utilized a standard 60-day oral exposure period to assess the effects of PFOS on the response of inflammatory cytokines [tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-1 β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6)]. Adult male C57BL/6 mice were dosed daily by oral gavage with PFOS at 0, 0.0083, 0.0167, 0.0833, 0.4167, 0.8333 or 2.0833 mg/kg/day to yield a targeted Total Administered Dose (TAD) over 60 days of 0, 0.5, 1, 5, 25, 50, or 125 mg PFOS/kg, respectively. The percentage of peritoneal macrophages (CD11b+ cells) was significantly increased at concentrations ≥ 1 mg PFOS/kg TAD in a dose-dependent manner. Ex vivo IL-1β production by peritoneal macrophages was elevated substantially at concentrations of ≥ 5 mg PFOS/kg TAD. Moreover, PFOS exposure markedly enhanced the ex vivo production of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 by peritoneal and splenic macrophages when stimulated either in vitro or in vivo with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The serum levels of these inflammatory cytokines observed in response to in vivo stimulation with LPS were elevated substantially by exposure to PFOS. PFOS exposure elevated the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and proto-oncogene, c-myc, in the spleen. These data suggest that exposure to PFOS modulates the inflammatory response, and further research is needed to determine the mechanism of action.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In vivo and in vitro experiments have demonstrated that PFAS exposure can lead to severe inflammation in organs, including the liver, kidneys, and nervous system.
“in vivo and in vitro experiments have demonstrated that PFAS exposure can lead to severe inflammation in organs, including the liver, kidneys, and nervous system”
From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Dong et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Dong, G., Zhang, Y., Zheng, L., Liang, Z., Jin, Y., & He, Q.
- Affiliations
- China Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Dong, Guang‐Hui
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-24
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 285-296
- ISSN
- 1520-4081 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-7278
- OpenAlex
- W2012086752
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Toxicology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Keywords
- PFOS, immunotoxicity, inflammation, inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α, IL-1β, interleukin-6, peritoneal macrophages, lipopolysaccharide stimulation, c-Myc, perfluorinated compounds, oral exposure
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fluorocarbons, Inflammation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Spleen, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Interleukin-6, Cytokines, Macrophages, Peritoneal, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Mice, Interleukin-1beta
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review