Absent mandibular gap in the retronasal triangle view: A clue to the diagnosis of micrognathia in the first trimester
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To describe a new ultrasound technique that may be useful for the diagnosis of micrognathia in the first trimester of pregnancy. Methods: The retronasal triangle (RNT) view is a technique that captures the coronal plane of the face in which the primary palate and the frontal processes of the maxilla are visualized simultaneously. Normal first‐trimester fetuses display a characteristic gap between the right and left body of the mandible in this view (the ‘mandibular gap’). The presence or absence of this gap was evaluated and measured prospectively during real‐time scanning (n = 154) and retrospectively by analyzing three‐dimensional (3D) datasets (n = 50) in normal first‐trimester fetuses undergoing screening for aneuploidy at 11–13 weeks' gestation. 3D datasets from 12 fetuses with suspected micrognathia were also collected and examined retrospectively for the same features. Results: The mandibular gap was identified in all 204 normal fetuses and increased linearly with increasing crown–rump length (y = 0.033x + 0.435; R2 = 0.316), with no statistically significant differences between measurements obtained by two‐dimensional ultrasound and 3D offline analysis. Among fetuses with suspected micrognathia, three 3D datasets were excluded from analysis because of poor image quality in one and the diagnosis of a normal chin in two. In the remaining nine fetuses, the mandibular gap was absent and was replaced by a bony structure representing the receding chin in seven (77.8%) cases and was not visualized due to severe retrognathia in the remaining two (22.2%) cases. All fetuses with micrognathia had associated anomalies, including seven with aneuploidy and two with skeletal dysplasia. Conclusions: The RNT view may be a helpful technique for detecting micrognathia in the first trimester. The absence of the mandibular gap or failure to identify the mandible in this view is highly suggestive of micrognathia and should prompt a targeted ultrasound scan to assess for other anomalies. Further research is needed to determine the false‐positive and false‐negative rates of this technique. Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mandibular gap was present in 77.8% of cases with micrognathia, posing as a possible ultrasound marker for this structural anomaly.
“Additionally, the mandibular gap was present in 77.8% of cases with micrognathia, posing as a possible ultrasound marker for this structural anomaly [43].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Sepulveda, W., Wong, A. E., Viñals, F., Andreeva, E., Adzehova, N., & Martinez‐Ten, P.
- Affiliations
- Clínica Las Condes (CL)
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology (RU)
- ORCID
- Wong, A. E.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-156
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2055329208
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- micrognathia, prenatal diagnosis, 3D fetal ultrasound, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, mandibular retrusion, skeletal dysplasia
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Mandible, Maxilla, Micrognathism, Nasal Bone, Palate, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review