The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To investigate the accuracy of intrapartum transvaginal digital examination in defining the position of the fetal head before instrumental delivery. Patients and Methods: In 64 singleton pregnancies undergoing instrumental delivery the fetal head position was determined by transvaginal digital examination by the attending obstetrician. Immediately after or before the clinical examination, the fetal head position was determined by transabdominal ultrasound by a trained sonographer who was not aware of the clinical findings. The digital examination was considered to be correct if the fetal head position was within ± 45° of the ultrasound finding. The accuracy of the digital examination was examined in relation to maternal and fetal characteristics. Results: Digital examination failed to define the correct fetal head position in 17 (26.6%) cases. In 12 of 17 (70.6%) errors the difference was ≥ 90° and in five (29.4%) the difference was between 45° and 90°. The accuracy of vaginal digital examination was 83% for occiput‐anterior and 54% for occiput‐lateral + occiput‐posterior positions. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant independent contributions in explaining the variance in the accuracy of vaginal examination for the station of the fetal head, the position of the fetal head and the experience of the examining obstetrician. Conclusions: Digital examination during instrumental delivery fails to identify the correct fetal head position in about one quarter of cases. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound
Ghi, T., Eggebø, T., Lees, C., Kalache, K., Rozenberg, P., Youssef, A., Salomon, L. J., & Tutschek, B. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.19072 · Cited by 348
Kalache, K. D., Dückelmann, A. M., Michaelis, S. A. M., Lange, J., Cichon, G., & Dudenhausen, J. W. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6294 · Cited by 262
Ghi, T., Conversano, F., Ramirez Zegarra, R., Pisani, P., Dall'Asta, A., Lanzone, A., Lau, W., Vimercati, A., Iliescu, D. G., Mappa, I., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.23739 · Cited by 32
Guittier, M.-J., & Othenin-Girard, V. (2012) · Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité · doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.05.006 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Akmal, S., Kametas, N., Tsoi, E., Hargreaves, C., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 437-440
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2052395824
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.103
- The paper
- Akmal, S., Kametas, N., Tsoi, E., Hargreaves, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2003). Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.