Cited by 68Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsBirth, Development, and Health

Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks: Second-trimester biophysical and biochemical markers of SGA

Open access
Poon, L. C., Lesmes, C., Gallo, D. M., Akolekar, R., Nicolaides, K. H.·2015·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of combined screening by maternal characteristics and medical history, fetal biometry and biophysical and biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks' gestation, for prediction of delivery of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates, in the absence of pre-eclampsia (PE), and examine the potential value of such assessment in deciding whether the third-trimester scan should be at 32 and/or 36 weeks' gestation. METHODS: This was a screening study in 7816 singleton pregnancies, including 389 (5.0%) that delivered SGA neonates with birth weight < 5(th) percentile (SGA < 5(th) ), in the absence of PE. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine if screening by a combination of maternal factors, fetal biometry, uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and maternal serum concentrations of placental growth factor (PlGF) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) had significant contribution in predicting SGA neonates. A model was developed for selecting the gestational age for third-trimester assessment, at 32 and/or 36 weeks, based on the results of screening at 19-24 weeks. RESULTS: Significant independent contributions to the prediction of SGA < 5(th) were provided by maternal factors, fetal biometry, UtA-PI and serum PlGF and AFP. The detection rate (DR) of such combined screening at 19-24 weeks was 100%, 78% and 42% for SGA < 5(th) delivering < 32, at 32-36 and ≥ 37 weeks' gestation, respectively, at a false-positive rate (FPR) of 10%. In a hypothetical model, it was estimated that if the desired objective of prenatal screening is to predict about 80% of the cases of SGA < 5(th) , it would be necessary to select 11% of the population at the 19-24-week assessment to be reassessed at 32 weeks and 44% to be reassessed at 36 weeks; 57% would not require a third-trimester scan. CONCLUSION: Prenatal prediction of a high proportion of SGA neonates necessitates the undertaking of screening in the third trimester of pregnancy, in addition to assessment in the second trimester, and the timing of such screening, at 32 and/or 36 weeks, should be contingent on the results of the assessment at 19-24 weeks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.14904

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although FGR detection rates >90% have been reported in first- and second-trimester prediction models combining maternal factors, biochemical markers, and uterine artery Doppler, lack of external validation or demonstration of improved pregnancy outcomes limits their clinical applicability.

    “Although FGR detection rates >90% have been reported in firstand second-trimester prediction models that combine maternal factors, biochemical markers, and uterine artery Doppler, lack of external validation or demonstration of improved pregnancy outcomes limits their clinical applicability.145,150,151”

    From Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction (2020) · cites this paper as [145]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 68

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]18. Fadigas C, Saiid Y, Gonzalez R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 559-565.

Authors
Poon, L. C., Lesmes, C., Gallo, D. M., Akolekar, R., & Nicolaides, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine (GB)
  • Medway Maritime Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Poon, L. C.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-02
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
437-445
ISSN
0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150371322
Cited by
68
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fetal Medicine Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
small for gestational age, prenatal screening, uterine artery pulsatility index, placental growth factor, alpha-fetoprotein, fetal biometry, detection rate, false positive rate, singleton pregnancy, birth weight prediction, fetal growth
MeSH terms
Placenta Growth Factor, Adult, alpha-Fetoproteins, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Proteins, Prenatal Care, Prenatal Diagnosis, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed, Uterine Artery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review