Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Although advances in ultrasound have facilitated the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities in the first trimester, fetal biometry at this stage of pregnancy remains underused in prenatal diagnosis. We hypothesized that charts which directly correlate measurements to crown-rump length (CRL) could be more accurate than those based on gestational age (GA) derived from CRL measurement. The aim of this study was to construct CRL-based biometric charts. METHODS: Measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC) and abdominal circumference (AC) were prospectively collected from 939 normal singleton fetuses. Charts and predictive equations were constructed from data obtained from pregnancies in which the CRL was between 45 and 84 mm and for which the outcome was normal. RESULTS: Measurements of BPD, HC and AC from 880 fetuses who met the criteria were correlated with CRL and used to construct charts and predictive equations. The standard error of estimates using CRL was significantly lower than that using GA in all cases. DISCUSSION: First-trimester growth charts and predictive equations based on CRL instead of GA are more accurate. They might have a role in quality control of first-trimester ultrasound examination and may help in the diagnosis of fetal conditions that involve early growth abnormalities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Femoral length shows high variability in its measurement and therefore cannot be used reliably for gestational age.
“Both recommendations are justified, as the FL shows high variability in its measurement and therefore cannot be used reliably for gestational age [27].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Salomon, L. J., Bernard, J. P., Duyme, M., Dorion, A., & Ville, Y.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Ville, Y.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-66
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2040171499
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Keywords
- crown-rump length, gestational age estimation, biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, prediction equations, fetal growth disorders
- MeSH terms
- Abdomen, Adult, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Fetus, Gestational Age, Head, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Reference Values, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review