Cut-off value of nuchal translucency as indication for chromosomal microarray analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: An association between isolated, increased nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and pathogenic findings on chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been reported . A recent meta‐analysis reported that most studies use a NT cut‐off value of 3.5 mm. However, considering NT distribution and the commonly accepted 5% false‐positive rate in maternal serum screening, NT cut‐off levels should be reconsidered. The aim of this study was to assess different NT cut‐off levels as indication for CMA and to determine whether CMA should be recommended for mildly increased NT of 3.0–3.4 mm. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of singleton pregnancies with CMA results and either normal NT and no other finding or with increased NT as the only medical indication for CMA at the time of an invasive procedure (increased NT was considered an isolated finding in cases of advanced maternal age). Women with normal fetal NT who underwent CMA did so at their own request. A single laboratory performed all genetic analyses. Comparative genomic hybridization microarray analysis or single nucleotide polymorphism array technology was used for CMA. If combined first‐trimester screening (NT and biochemistry) indicated increased risk for common aneuploidies, the case was excluded. NT was used to divide cases into three groups (≤ 2.9 mm, 3.0–3.4 mm and ≥ 3.5 mm) and their CMA results were compared. Results: CMA results were recorded in 1588 pregnancies, among which 770 fetuses had either normal NT with no other finding or isolated increased NT. Of these, 462 had NT ≤ 2.9 mm, 170 had NT of 3.0–3.4 mm and 138 had NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Pathogenic copy number variants were found in 1.7%, 6.5% and 13.8% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that CMA should be recommended when fetuses have isolated, mildly increased NT (3.0–3.4 mm). Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For an NT over 3.5 mm, pathogenic variants were detected in 13.8% of fetuses, as well as in 6.5% of cases with an NT over 3.0 mm.
“This is based on a study that showed that for an NT over 3.5 mm, pathogenic variants were detected in 13.8% of fetuses, as well as in 6.5% of cases with an NT over 3.0 mm [85].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [85]
Cites
Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6 · Cited by 1,572 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Maya, I., Yacobson, S., Kahana, S., Yeshaya, J., Tenne, T., Agmon‐Fishman, I., Cohen‐Vig, L., Shohat, M., Basel‐Vanagaite, L., & Sharony, R.
- Affiliations
- Rabin Medical Center (IL)
- Meir Medical Center (IL)
- Recanati Genetics Institute, Beilinson Hospital Rabin Medical Center Petah Tikva Israel
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Sharony, R.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-26
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 332-335
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2810083578
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- nuchal translucency, cut-off values, chromosomal microarray analysis, copy number variation, prenatal genetic testing, first-trimester screening, fetal aneuploidy, singleton pregnancy, prenatal diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Down Syndrome, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Israel, Male, Medical Records, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Microarray Analysis, Nuchal Translucency Measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review