Cited by 65Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

Cut-off value of nuchal translucency as indication for chromosomal microarray analysis

Open access
Maya, I., Yacobson, S., Kahana, S., Yeshaya, J., Tenne, T., Agmon‐Fishman, I., Cohen‐Vig, L., Shohat, M. +2 more·2017·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: An association between isolated, increased nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and pathogenic findings on chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been reported . A recent meta‐analysis reported that most studies use a NT cut‐off value of 3.5 mm. However, considering NT distribution and the commonly accepted 5% false‐positive rate in maternal serum screening, NT cut‐off levels should be reconsidered. The aim of this study was to assess different NT cut‐off levels as indication for CMA and to determine whether CMA should be recommended for mildly increased NT of 3.0–3.4 mm. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of singleton pregnancies with CMA results and either normal NT and no other finding or with increased NT as the only medical indication for CMA at the time of an invasive procedure (increased NT was considered an isolated finding in cases of advanced maternal age). Women with normal fetal NT who underwent CMA did so at their own request. A single laboratory performed all genetic analyses. Comparative genomic hybridization microarray analysis or single nucleotide polymorphism array technology was used for CMA. If combined first‐trimester screening (NT and biochemistry) indicated increased risk for common aneuploidies, the case was excluded. NT was used to divide cases into three groups (≤ 2.9 mm, 3.0–3.4 mm and ≥ 3.5 mm) and their CMA results were compared. Results: CMA results were recorded in 1588 pregnancies, among which 770 fetuses had either normal NT with no other finding or isolated increased NT. Of these, 462 had NT ≤ 2.9 mm, 170 had NT of 3.0–3.4 mm and 138 had NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Pathogenic copy number variants were found in 1.7%, 6.5% and 13.8% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that CMA should be recommended when fetuses have isolated, mildly increased NT (3.0–3.4 mm). Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.17421

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For an NT over 3.5 mm, pathogenic variants were detected in 13.8% of fetuses, as well as in 6.5% of cases with an NT over 3.0 mm.

    “This is based on a study that showed that for an NT over 3.5 mm, pathogenic variants were detected in 13.8% of fetuses, as well as in 6.5% of cases with an NT over 3.0 mm [85].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maya, I., Yacobson, S., Kahana, S., Yeshaya, J., Tenne, T., Agmon‐Fishman, I., Cohen‐Vig, L., Shohat, M., Basel‐Vanagaite, L., & Sharony, R.
Affiliations
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
  • Meir Medical Center (IL)
  • Recanati Genetics Institute, Beilinson Hospital Rabin Medical Center Petah Tikva Israel
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Sharony, R.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-26
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
332-335
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2810083578
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
nuchal translucency, cut-off values, chromosomal microarray analysis, copy number variation, prenatal genetic testing, first-trimester screening, fetal aneuploidy, singleton pregnancy, prenatal diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Down Syndrome, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Israel, Male, Medical Records, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Microarray Analysis, Nuchal Translucency Measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review