The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Role of transvaginal ultrasound in evaluation of ureteral involvement in deep infiltrating endometriosis
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To assess whether routine examination of the ureters on transvaginal sonography (TVS) can identify reliably potential silent ureteral involvement by endometriosis and should therefore be recommended in all patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Methods: This was a prospective study of 200 consecutive patients scheduled for surgery for DIE, evaluated between January 2012 and December 2014 at a tertiary endometriosis center at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy. Routine TVS, abdominal ultrasound and gynecological examination were performed within 3 months before surgery, and patient history, signs and symptoms were recorded. Surgical and histological findings were compared with the preoperative ultrasonographic diagnosis. The main outcome of interest was the presence of ureteral dilatation or hydronephrosis caused by endometriosis. Results: Of 200 patients with DIE, associated ureteral dilatation was diagnosed on TVS in 13 (6.5%) cases. Ureteral involvement was confirmed intraoperatively in all 13 cases by detection of ureteral dilatation caused by endometriotic tissue surrounding the ureter and causing stenosis. Of the 13 patients with ureteral dilatation, renal ultrasound detected six (46.2%) cases of hydronephrosis. Mean duration of visualization and study of dilated ureters was 5 min (range, 3–9 min). Ureteric diameter was ≥ 6 mm in all cases of ureteral dilatation, with a median diameter of 6.9 mm (range, 6–18 mm). Both ureters were identified on TVS in all 200 patients with DIE. Conclusions: Our study confirms a relatively high incidence of ureteral involvement in patients with DIE. TVS appears to be a reliable tool for the diagnosis of ureteral involvement and, additionally, it allows the detection of both the level and degree of obstruction. Our findings confirm that TVS examination is an accurate non‐invasive diagnostic tool for the detection of ureteral involvement by endometriosis. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) combined with urinary system ultrasound is considered a first-line imaging modality for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) because of its noninvasive nature, affordability, and reproducibility.
“Currently, transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) combined with urinary system ultrasound is considered a first-line imaging modality for diagnosing DIE because of its noninvasive nature, affordability, and reproducibility [11, 12].”
From Ureteral endometriosis post-hysterectomy for adenomyosis: a case report and literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 66
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Frego E, 2002, Ureteral endometriosis: urologic features, Arch Ital Urol Androl, 74, 3
- Talner LB, 1846, Clinical Urography (2nd edn)
- Friedemberg RM, 1990, Clinical Urography
- Wein A, Campbell–Walsh Urology Review Manual
- Block B., 2011, The Practice of Ultrasound: A Step‐by‐Step Guide to Abdominal Scanning (2nd edn)
Metadata
- Authors
- Carfagna, P., De Cicco Nardone, C., De Cicco Nardone, A., Testa, A. C., Scambia, G., Marana, R., & De Cicco Nardone, F.
- Affiliations
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology ‘Campus Bio‐Medico’ University of Rome Rome Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Rome Italy
- Corresponding author
- Carfagna, P.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-04
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 550-555
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2797479637
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
- Keywords
- deep infiltrating endometriosis, ureteral involvement, transvaginal ultrasound, ureteral dilatation, hydronephrosis, ureteral stricture, preoperative diagnosis, non-invasive diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Hydronephrosis, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Retroperitoneal Space, Ultrasonography, Ureter, Ureteral Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review